Page 1 of 2
We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:48 am
by pipigrande
Do you say we was or we were?
I say 'we were' and every time I hear 'we was' I'm like hmmm, because it sounds bad to me...
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:50 am
by Kirkaldi
We were.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:02 am
by Mirosuke
For me,
Were is the right word for
We.
Btw, same question with:
"
You're an idiot." or "
Your an idiot."
I hate the ppl who say it wrong
(Second one is fail, the first one is ok)
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:04 am
by XemnasXD
was just sounds stupid....
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:13 am
by Reise
I'm not gonna lie I say "we was" on occasion.
Most of the time though I say it normally.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:01 am
by Starrie
We were... I think thats pretty obvious, we was just doesnt sound good.
I was / I were
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:07 am
by CrimsonNuker
Naw homie its we was.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:07 am
by Midori
In the area i live in, "We was" is used by white trash.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:16 am
by evilpeta
whoever started the "we/they/you was" shit is an idiot
and 'it sounds bad' because it's wrong
Mirosuke wrote:For me,
Were is the right word for
We.
Btw, same question with:
"
You're an idiot." or "
Your an idiot."
I hate the ppl who say it wrong
(Second one is fail, the first one is ok)
yeah, same goes for There, Their and They're. *sigh*
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:27 am
by Breed
we have a very literate forum
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:35 am
by kreisimees
Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum
Would you prefer illiterate?
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:43 am
by Breed
kreisimees wrote:Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum
Would you prefer illiterate?
I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that theres teenagers who cant spell at all.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:46 am
by Snickers
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:39 am
by woutR
We was is for black gangsters and wiggers.
What annoys me the most is their/they're and your/you're. In my own language I got annoyed to **** by hun/hen which could either mean them and their.
Literally what these fucktards are saying is "I'm going to their."
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:26 am
by MrJoey
Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum
There's plenty of illiterates on this forum, hopefully they have seizures or something when they see this topic.
v Alas, no seizure.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:47 am
by M3K0S
haha we was for some black ppl and wiggers...
we were is the correct term...
but cmon it dusnt matter every1 has their own vocabulary and as long as sum1 understand what your trying to say youre cool...
like when i tell sum1 to stop it i say "kick it!"...
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:15 am
by Psychedeelic
ive never ever used we was.. sounds so wrong
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:51 pm
by noobert mclagg
We were, we was just does sound right.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:12 pm
by NuclearSilo
Starrie wrote:We were... I think thats pretty obvious, we was just doesnt sound good.
I was / I were
"I were" exists
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:48 pm
by XemnasXD
M3K0S wrote:haha we was for some black ppl and wiggers...
because only some black people or white people trying to act black say we was....
thank you for your stereotype
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 3:48 pm
by evilpeta
he's not generalizing so it's not a stereotype
it's like saying some asians have small dicks, that's not a stereotype either.
asians have small dicks. blacks and wiggers say 'we was'. those are stereotypes
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:19 pm
by XemnasXD
not to take this far off topic so this will be my last word on the subject but you do realize that stereotyping IS generalizing....
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:30 pm
by heroo
we was is da shizzle yohh.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:38 pm
by Draquish
Breed wrote:kreisimees wrote:Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum
Would you prefer illiterate?
I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that there
's teenagers who can
't spell at all.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:48 pm
by evilpeta
XemnasXD wrote:not to take this far off topic so this will be my last word on the subject but you do realize that stereotyping IS generalizing....
exactly and that's why it was not meant to be a stereotype/generalization since he added "SOME" in the sentence. not that hard to figure out
Draquish wrote:Breed wrote:kreisimees wrote:Would you prefer illiterate?
I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that there
's teenagers who can
't spell at all.
fail at grammar check
supposed to be there're not there's
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:08 pm
by Draquish
Touche mademoiselle.
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:20 pm
by XemnasXD
there're is not a word. It is merely some backwoods patois...
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:33 pm
by cin
Breed wrote:we has a very literate forum
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:19 pm
by Mirosuke
Re: We was/ We were
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 12:10 am
by inky
