Page 1 of 1
Headphone comparison
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:01 am
by Rainigul
Hey, I've got some skullcandy INK'd earbuds, when I first got them however long ago that was (maybe a year or something), they were the best earbuds I've ever owned, despite their budget price. Sadly, the right earcable has started to split and I can now see the wire, so I think they may die soon.
I have a question though, should I buy another pair of INK'd buds (I don't like smokin's), or should I get the Sennheiser CX 300's?
Which one is better? Or is there something else that is <$50 that is even better?
Thanks for your help.
Re: Headphone comparison
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:20 am
by Da_Realest
I'm pretty sure the CX 300 has better sound quality. I've never had any experience with any skullcandy headphones but I do own the CX 300 and the CX 500. Some places sell the CX 500 for less than $50 so get that version if you can.
Re: Headphone comparison
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:46 am
by Rainigul
Da_Realest wrote:I'm pretty sure the CX 300 has better sound quality. I've never had any experience with any skullcandy headphones but I do own the CX 300 and the CX 500. Some places sell the CX 500 for less than $50 so get that version if you can.
Can you tell me the difference please, and if it's worth it.
Thanks much.
Re: Headphone comparison
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:54 am
by Da_Realest
The bass is stronger and much clearer in the CX 500. The sound overall has more clarity in the CX 500 version than the CX 300. I heard that both versions come with their own volume control but only my CX 500 headphones have that feature. If you can't get the CX 500 for below $50 or close to $50 dollars, don't bother buying them. Unless you have an ear for good sound quality, the only major difference you will notice between the 2 is that the bass is stronger in the CX 500.
Re: Headphone comparison
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:21 am
by -Evan
Razer Megalodon