Page 1 of 1

Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:12 am
by Squirt
http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/co ... on-charge/
WASHINGTON (AP) — George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, was indicted Monday on charges of high treason. The charges, filed by Attorney General Russ Feingold late in the evening, allege that Mr. Bush, knowing full well that Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction, falsified information in order to pursue the disastrous Iraq War. (See “U.S. Knew No W.M.D.s in Iraq,” on Page A1, and the petition at http://www.democrats.com/pardon.)
The former President appeared perturbed by his own charges against him. (GAVIN BELLOWS/BOSTON GLOBE)

The former President appeared perturbed by his own charges against him. (GAVIN BELLOWS/BOSTON GLOBE)
Source: New York Times/CBS News poll

Source: New York Times/CBS News poll

Federal District Judge Michael Ratner denied Mr. Bush’s request to represent himself. Ratner is the former president of the Center for Constitutional Rights.

http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/tr ... mediately/
WASHINGTON — Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom were brought to an unceremonious close today with a quiet announcement by the Department of Defense that troops would be home within weeks.

“This is the best face we can put on the most unfortunate adventure in modern American history,” Defense spokesman Kevin Sites said at a special joint session of Congress. “Today, we can finally enjoy peace — not the peace of the brave, perhaps, but at least peace.”


These are fake stories don't fall for them

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:14 am
by BlackFox898
didn't here of it, weird...

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:17 am
by Midori
Published: July 4th, 2009


I don't get it.

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:19 am
by Verfo
that site isnt real, its a replica of this site http://www.nytimes.com/ , but it has wrong info on it.

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:22 am
by Squirt
That explains thats why I was like What the **** I was here last week?

Damn these guys are good.

I thought it was illegal to print false information.

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:31 am
by Ashikiheyun
If the world suddenly woke up and goodness prevailed, then this would actually happen, but nope, sadly not. :(

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:37 am
by CrimsonNuker
If it was fake..THEN WHY THE FUCK DID YOU POST IT?

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:38 am
by Verfo
CrimsonNuker wrote:If it was fake..THEN WHY THE FUCK DID YOU POST IT?

He posted it thinking it was real but then i posted saying that site doesnt have real news on there, and he changed the title.

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:42 am
by Barotix
I was going to troll with it, but then I deleted the topic I made; it looks like squirt saw the link and fell for it. :P

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:23 am
by LaloHao
Squirt wrote:That explains thats why I was like What the **** I was here last week?

Damn these guys are good.

I thought it was illegal to print false information.

But it's not printed... It's on the internet :twisted:

Re: Bush indicted war over?

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:25 am
by Locketart
Squirt wrote:That explains thats why I was like What the **** I was here last week?

Damn these guys are good.

I thought it was illegal to print false information.


I don't think fake articles are considered libel.

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:35 am
by TOloseGT
word...

Re: Bush indicted war over= Fake

Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:52 pm
by Squirt
Barotix wrote:I was going to troll with it, but then I deleted the topic I made; it looks like squirt saw the link and fell for it. :P

Whoever made that was good.
I didn't even notice the link >_<