Shadowman20818 wrote:Oh wow, someone beat me to it. And to think I thought that no one on SRF reads.
1984 was a mandatory read for my grade 12 English class, thus in the curriculum. Although teachers are given a choice of books, it's one of them that is usually chosen for highschools across all of my province.
Shadowman20818 wrote:Oh wow, someone beat me to it. And to think I thought that no one on SRF reads.
1984 was a mandatory read for my grade 12 English class, thus in the curriculum. Although teachers are given a choice of books, it's one of them that is usually chosen for highschools across all of my province.
12th grade... we had farenheit 451, killer angels (I'm in the U.S.), and Clockwork Orange (-.-) no 1984, where do you go to school? If you don't mind.
Shadowman20818 wrote:Oh wow, someone beat me to it. And to think I thought that no one on SRF reads.
1984 was a mandatory read for my grade 12 English class, thus in the curriculum. Although teachers are given a choice of books, it's one of them that is usually chosen for highschools across all of my province.
12th grade... we had farenheit 451, killer angels (I'm in the U.S.), and Clockwork Orange (-.-) no 1984, where do you go to school? If you don't mind.
I used to be at pere rene de galinee, now i'm at the university of waterloo. Farenheit 451 was a choice for precollegial students.
Shadowman20818 wrote:Oh wow, someone beat me to it. And to think I thought that no one on SRF reads.
1984 was a mandatory read for my grade 12 English class, thus in the curriculum. Although teachers are given a choice of books, it's one of them that is usually chosen for highschools across all of my province.
12th grade... we had farenheit 451, killer angels (I'm in the U.S.), and Clockwork Orange (-.-) no 1984, where do you go to school? If you don't mind.
I used to be at pere rene de galinee, now i'm at the university of waterloo. Farenheit 451 was a choice for precollegial students.
Shadowman20818 wrote:Oh wow, someone beat me to it. And to think I thought that no one on SRF reads.
1984 was a mandatory read for my grade 12 English class, thus in the curriculum. Although teachers are given a choice of books, it's one of them that is usually chosen for highschools across all of my province.
12th grade... we had farenheit 451, killer angels (I'm in the U.S.), and Clockwork Orange (-.-) no 1984, where do you go to school? If you don't mind.
I used to be at pere rene de galinee, now i'm at the university of waterloo. Farenheit 451 was a choice for precollegial students.
grade 12? grade 10 over here
I believe he's past 12th grade... you should start reading now.
Barotix wrote::roll: numbers thier not even real. thats why stuff like 2+2 =5 happens.
numbers are abstract, and just like anything abstract dont have 2 exist as 1 states it does.
for example i am not sitting in this chair underneath my ass. as a matter of fact this supposed chair does not exist.
get it??
meh GL for those who dont understand
also. nah shes 17, but a senior
hmmm we got some sensibly theories comin kinda.Anyways if the chair under your ass isnt real then your butt would be in pain as u wouldve fallen from the supposed non-existent chair unless u were standing.Your right i dont get it that much
.Im confused
Last edited by FireVortex on Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sacchin wrote:The dickatry is spreading around on srf faster then the flu.
FireVortex wrote:hmmm we got some sensibly theories comin kinda.Anyways if the chair under your ass isnt real then your butt would be in pain as u wouldve fallen from the supposed non-existent chair .Im confused
I see you are not familiar with the teachings of Matrinism,
FireVortex wrote:hmmm we got some sensibly theories comin kinda.Anyways if the chair under your ass isnt real then your butt would be in pain as u wouldve fallen from the supposed non-existent chair .Im confused
I see you are not familiar with the teachings of Matrinism,
i shouldve paid more attention to Morpheous
Sacchin wrote:The dickatry is spreading around on srf faster then the flu.
In measurement in physics, the number of significant digits is usually encoded in the way a number is written. That is, unless otherwise specified, "2" has only one significant digit, which means it represents a measurement with a margin of error of 0.5, which means the actual value may lie between 1.5 and 2.5. When adding such measurements together, the margins of error are also added, so 2 ± 0.5 + 2 ± 0.5 = 4 ± 1.0 . And since "5" actually means 5 ± 0.5, these margins clearly overlap and one could jokingly argue that the numbers are the same. When adding more precise measurements, for example 2.0 + 2.0, the margin of error is smaller and the maximum number that could be "reached" would in this case be 4.1. See also approximation.
Also interestingly enough, it can be "proven" that you cannot get from point A to point B. Essentially that travel is impossible.
Missing the good times in SRO...
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
In measurement in physics, the number of significant digits is usually encoded in the way a number is written. That is, unless otherwise specified, "2" has only one significant digit, which means it represents a measurement with a margin of error of 0.5, which means the actual value may lie between 1.5 and 2.5. When adding such measurements together, the margins of error are also added, so 2 ± 0.5 + 2 ± 0.5 = 4 ± 1.0 . And since "5" actually means 5 ± 0.5, these margins clearly overlap and one could jokingly argue that the numbers are the same. When adding more precise measurements, for example 2.0 + 2.0, the margin of error is smaller and the maximum number that could be "reached" would in this case be 4.1. See also approximation.
Also interestingly enough, it can be "proven" that you cannot get from point A to point B. Essentially that travel is impossible.
i havent read what u said due to another thread that gave me a headache but i think thats the best answer so far
Sacchin wrote:The dickatry is spreading around on srf faster then the flu.
Depends on the margin of error. Are you speaking in two significant digits? 2.5 can represent 2.54, so 2.5 + 2.5 = 5.08.
Numbers can be thought to represent points on a number line. Since there are an infinite number of points on a number line, the number 2 is just an approximation on that line. There are an infinite number of points between "2" and "3" so theoretically you could say 2+2=5 for exceptionally large values of 2.
Missing the good times in SRO...
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
Depends on the margin of error. Are you speaking in two significant digits? 2.5 can represent 2.54, so 2.5 + 2.5 = 5.08.
Numbers can be thought to represent points on a number line. Since there are an infinite number of points on a number line, the number 2 is just an approximation on that line. There are an infinite number of points between "2" and "3" so theoretically you could say 2+2=5 for exceptionally large values of 2.
hmm can u put it in terms where a guy whose head wasnt damaged by an english thread plx
Sacchin wrote:The dickatry is spreading around on srf faster then the flu.
Depends on the margin of error. Are you speaking in two significant digits? 2.5 can represent 2.54, so 2.5 + 2.5 = 5.08.
Numbers can be thought to represent points on a number line. Since there are an infinite number of points on a number line, the number 2 is just an approximation on that line. There are an infinite number of points between "2" and "3" so theoretically you could say 2+2=5 for exceptionally large values of 2.