Goseki wrote:What would've happened if they kept going?
guess well just have to wait and see.
Goseki wrote:What would've happened if they kept going?

SM-Count wrote:[SD]Master_Wong wrote:SM-Count wrote:Chill out a little wong, not worth it arguing with internet.
dont care bout the nets i pick a tard and argue til i get bored im happy nd when i get bored they are happy as they feel they won til i start it again you know me by now
Yeah, but some get all butthurt and spam report after they start something and it spins out of control. Then I gotta read all posts, even the unfunnies :\ Should try to limit yourself to one 'you're a Farking retard' per thread



DluR wrote:master wang please go back to watching your porn, you're making me sick with you superior attitude, while you're just a frustrated teenie thinking hes big and mean if he's flaming on a gaming forum, just because you're gettin bullied at school every day. Common attitude.
Annnd yes! they just showed it on the news (and also it has appeared in some newspapers in my country), it's OFFICIAL now, the golobal warming was just a big hoax and some of the emails authors have already admitted they sent the e-mails. The hacker who found the emails is now very famous, indeed lol
so now you fat kiddies who love the television and only listen to what they tell you on the news, while the internet is a big ugly conspiracy, now you have the proof. They should show on the news all over the world now that is has become official


McLovin1t wrote:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFail.
Global warming is 100% proven...
Cell, these heatings aren't natural, to say the least. Those warming and cooling periods occurred under a stable, natural, CO2 emission period. Because of what we are doing now, the stability is diminishing, just look at the ozone, it's clear that we have a very negative effect, and to say that it doesn't exist, frankly makes you look retarded.


McLovin1t wrote:Wong, those ice ages have had influence of CO2, but not at this catastrophic magnitude.


Zen wrote:More news comming out about the hacking's with a video on the site, under *Best Videos* section of the site too lol![]()
Hackers catch scientists on global warming data manipulation
http://russiatoday.com/Best_Videos/2009 ... andal.html
*Hackers have tried to prove that global warming researchers are manipulating their data, after stealing sensitive e-mails from one of the UK's leading climate research centres.*




.curve wrote:Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


Goseki wrote:Back. So I discussed this a bit with my gf since she's the weather person. From what the scientific community around me has been saying, and what she knows. She thinks they only manipulated the data to get more funding. A serious scientific offense.
DluR wrote:I say if it proves to be true or at least appears on the "big broadcasters" news, you should all get banned
if youre so wise mr wang, then how do you explain all the shit they've been saying the past few years, about the US gettin flooded by the melting icebergs or climate changing in some parts of the world?
we still have winters and i don't see monkeys and parrots in trees, so where's that change? why aren't americans living underwater now? cause they didn't say it will happen in 20 years, but veeery soon. where's all that? if you're asking for proofs, then prove yourself that there IS global warming, and don't throw at me the carbon thing and stuff you copy and paste from wiki. and polluting is different from global warming also.. not same thing
So once again, maybe your pathetic little brains get it.. I'm not saying there's no pollution and so on, but the Glbal Warming as a concept (and I mean the whole thing) is just a media thing so some morons can get rich selling "ecological" technologies and others, to "save the planet from global warming". and let's not forget, reducing population, as kids are awful creatures who destroy the world as they breathe, and ofcourse the very famous carbon tax. And where's the helping or fixing anything here anyway? I don't see anyone hugging trees for the sake of the planet, just talking garbage and filling their pockets.
I'm done here for now, though SRF OTL amazes me once again how pathetic some teenie members here can be, that's the only reason for which I'm here. You guys wouldn't protect your mother the way you're defending the global warming crap, which is scary. At least explain to me why so much screaming if other people have different opinions? It's a free world?
I just don't need the TV to tell me what's true or not, I have a brain of my own and I can gather information from different opposite sources, put them in balance and then decide for myself what's real and what's not. Maybe some of you will discover the magic when you grow up
Zen wrote:Goseki wrote:Back. So I discussed this a bit with my gf since she's the weather person. From what the scientific community around me has been saying, and what she knows. She thinks they only manipulated the data to get more funding. A serious scientific offense.
This is why the story hasnt really broken yet, its just TOO big for any reporter to write up a quick report about, all they can really report at the moment is yes the university was hacked and what kind of content was taken,
The researchers will all be scrambling to get there stories straight
The skeptics will be going through all the research and analyzing the documents,
theres 140 meg of intenral documents and 8meg of emails,
The initial suspicion of cooked data was when the researchers refused to share there scientific finding's with the scientific community wich is illegal under the information act.
Wich obviously led to them being hacked and now all of there research is out there for the world to see,
Theres a .PDF file called Rules of the Game in the documents folder, wich when reading it reads as Brainwashing 101, this will probally be a big talking point from the skeptics when the story really breaks but alas, we will see.

DluR wrote:I say if it proves to be true or at least appears on the "big broadcasters" news, you should all get banned
DluR wrote:we still have winters and i don't see monkeys and parrots in trees, so where's that change? why aren't americans living underwater now? cause they didn't say it will happen in 20 years, but veeery soon. where's all that? if you're asking for proofs, then prove yourself that there IS global warming, and don't throw at me the carbon thing and stuff you copy and paste from wiki.
Wait, so a thread in a random gaming forum (on the internetz) is more credible than news broadcasters on TV? Wait wut.DluR wrote:so now you fat kiddies who love the television and only listen to what they tell you on the news, while the internet is a big ugly conspiracy, now you have the proof.

UnbeatableDevil wrote:By that logic, you and Zen should be banned if it is a hoax. lolwut?
DluR wrote:it's OFFICIAL now, the golobal warming was just a big hoax
Zen wrote:A hoax?
fox already reported it and debated it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfekvMHI ... r_embedded
lul glenn beck reporting on it also
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbxYVa2 ... re=related


DluR wrote:there you go, your beloved CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/23/hack ... index.html
it says clearly that the emails are real and the scientists themselves wrote them
it's pathetic, the emails show clearly what they were doing, the " we're using special language" or "it's out of context" is the most pathetic excuse I've ever heard, especially coming from a bunch of guys who call themselves scientists, and not 12 y/o kids
if any of this wasnt true, then why would they shit their pants so badly at the thought that it's all over the internet and on TV (@Reise, please go back to school and learn to read, I said it appeared on the news, on that TV you are all hugging, and also in newspapers.. at least in my country, where no one has nothing to lose if it all proves to be true).
Zen wrote:UnbeatableDevil wrote:By that logic, you and Zen should be banned if it is a hoax. lolwut?
A hoax?
fox already reported it and debated it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfekvMHI ... r_embedded
lul glenn beck reporting on it also
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbxYVa2 ... re=related

DluR wrote:(@Reise, please go back to school and learn to read, I said it appeared on the news, on that TV you are all hugging, and also in newspapers.. at least in my country, where no one has nothing to lose if it all proves to be true).

CeLL wrote:I think that the plain and simple fact of the matter is. Why the **** do they have to create false information if global warming is as much of an issue as it has been made to be. They should be able to rely on the TRUTH to get them their funding, don’t you think. On top of that, for whom were they faslifying info and why wasn’t it detectable when compared to all the other people studying the same issues?
Theyre lies don’t disprove global warming. But you don’t want to stop and wonder why they lied in the first place, and why they were so confident that they wouldn’t get caught as far as statistics and data were concerned. If it were the other way around, youd understand how this fuels skepticism.

[SD]Master_Wong wrote:CeLL wrote:I think that the plain and simple fact of the matter is. Why the **** do they have to create false information if global warming is as much of an issue as it has been made to be. They should be able to rely on the TRUTH to get them their funding, don’t you think. On top of that, for whom were they faslifying info and why wasn’t it detectable when compared to all the other people studying the same issues?
Theyre lies don’t disprove global warming. But you don’t want to stop and wonder why they lied in the first place, and why they were so confident that they wouldn’t get caught as far as statistics and data were concerned. If it were the other way around, youd understand how this fuels skepticism.
like all scientists they wanted to prove their theory, there are a number of theorys about global warming the correct one will prolly be given a grant to put it to use

CeLL wrote:[SD]Master_Wong wrote:CeLL wrote:I think that the plain and simple fact of the matter is. Why the **** do they have to create false information if global warming is as much of an issue as it has been made to be. They should be able to rely on the TRUTH to get them their funding, don’t you think. On top of that, for whom were they faslifying info and why wasn’t it detectable when compared to all the other people studying the same issues?
Theyre lies don’t disprove global warming. But you don’t want to stop and wonder why they lied in the first place, and why they were so confident that they wouldn’t get caught as far as statistics and data were concerned. If it were the other way around, youd understand how this fuels skepticism.
like all scientists they wanted to prove their theory, there are a number of theorys about global warming the correct one will prolly be given a grant to put it to use
...really. so its ok cause "all scientists" do it. so whats to say that everyone else isnt lying cause they want theyre theories to be correct too. you just totally shot yourself and your beliefs in the foot. i suggest you delete or edit that.


CeLL wrote:I think that the plain and simple fact of the matter is. Why the **** do they have to create false information if global warming is as much of an issue as it has been made to be. They should be able to rely on the TRUTH to get them their funding, don’t you think. On top of that, for whom were they faslifying info and why wasn’t it detectable when compared to all the other people studying the same issues?
Theyre lies don’t disprove global warming. But you don’t want to stop and wonder why they lied in the first place, and why they were so confident that they wouldn’t get caught as far as statistics and data were concerned. If it were the other way around, youd understand how this fuels skepticism.