crazyskwrls wrote:no it matches exactly alright... its just a "bug" in math
We'll go with that then.
It probably uses a similar trick to this:
(The line AB is actually two segments that are concave, while DE is convex which accounts for the missing square)
As you can see, the shapes form quadrilaterals rather than triangles because the ones on the bottom are 2° off. (112.4-90=22.4, 22.4!=20.4)
When the shapes are arranged into "triangles", both of them end up with a concave hypotenuse, and when they are moved to form the 5x13 rectangle they leave a small sliver of space between each other that amounts to exactly 1 square. The limited resolution of the GIF hides the space.
i saw this topic and read some post at school i directly come to the teachers lounge and ask my math teacher... he said that " 2+2= 5 is valid in reasoning, then 2+2= is always 4 and he didnt told me continually, and he will discuss it tommorow(i hate thrilling moments )"... and he also read the book that was so called "1989 thing..."
well i guess i'll post tommorow(if i can understand him ) .
As i ended the last chapter of my past never forgotten true love... ... a new one begins I'm begging to find a way on how to connect with someone new... ....somehow this new Chapter will be quite an experience.
As you can see, the shapes form quadrilaterals rather than triangles because the ones on the bottom are 2° off. (112.4-90=22.4, 22.4!=20.4)
When the shapes are arranged into "triangles", both of them end up with a concave hypotenuse, and when they are moved to form the 5x13 rectangle they leave a small sliver of space between each other that amounts to exactly 1 square. The limited resolution of the GIF hides the space.
As you can see, the shapes form quadrilaterals rather than triangles because the ones on the bottom are 2° off. (112.4-90=22.4, 22.4!=20.4)
When the shapes are arranged into "triangles", both of them end up with a concave hypotenuse, and when they are moved to form the 5x13 rectangle they leave a small sliver of space between each other that amounts to exactly 1 square. The limited resolution of the GIF hides the space.
That is only true in the context of a circuit diagram. On computers, OR is either represented with ||, sometimes as |, or written out.
A || B
A | B
A OR B
or A, B
The AND, NOT, NAND, NOR, XOR, and XNOR operations from your link cannot be represented in ASCII, therefore they are never used on computers outside of specialized circuit diagram software.
That is only true in the context of a circuit diagram. On computers, OR is either represented with ||, sometimes as |, or written out.
A || B A | B A OR B or A, B
The AND, NOT, NAND, NOR, XOR, and XNOR operations from your link cannot be represented in ASCII, therefore they are never used on computers outside of specialized circuit diagram software.
mad-tie wrote:What about 1+1=1? Binary also
You're talking about software, I was talking about hardware. But its binary language too!
)"... and he also read the book that was so called "1989 thing..."
) 
