300? more like 1300!!!

Anything else. Post a funny site or tell us about yourself. Discuss current events or whatever else you want. Post off topic threads here.
Post Reply
User avatar
the.unseen.
Frequent Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:58 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off topic
Contact:
Contact the.unseen.

Post by the.unseen. »

user wrote:
the.unseen. wrote:
Blurred wrote:
user wrote:
Blurred wrote:Either way.. sparta was still outnumbered by the persians. But also The persians had a poor army who made shields out of sticks(litterly).. Belive it or not. they were not poor, they were lightly geared because the Persian army relied on fast light infantries to do the fighting

Sparta had the better equipment. spartans just happened to wear full body armor

Persians are pretty dumb to not use siege weapons

spartans will need more than the phalanx formation when they got catapults throwing boulders at them



Most of the persians fought with virtually no body armor... How light did they wanna go? ><
the spartan fought in really the nude all they had was a red robe type thing that didn't even cover there privet parts only protection they had was a shield a sword and a helmet.

no they didn't, they had full body armor
the hoplite are the armored ones alot of the spartans wernt them (might not be correct) but some didn't fight in armor because it was to heavy for them.
Top
User avatar
user
Veteran Member
Posts: 3053
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:28 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: A place far far away

Post by user »

i got a test tomorrow, i'll dig deeper and get back at ya
Top
User avatar
Neojapan
Casual Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:18 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venice

Post by Neojapan »

satman83 wrote:the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:


i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG
Image
I am back!!
Apollo : Skrie 4X Pure INT Nuker
Top
ElCapuccino
Frequent Member
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:04 pm

Post by ElCapuccino »

Neojapan wrote:
satman83 wrote:the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:


i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong. 8)
<<banned from SRF got bot admission and illegal activities. -SG>>
Top
User avatar
user
Veteran Member
Posts: 3053
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:28 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: A place far far away

Post by user »

ElCapuccino wrote:
Neojapan wrote:
satman83 wrote:the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:


i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong. 8)

"Wikipedia is being banned by a handful of college history departments across the country"

"Recently, the history department at Middlebury College in Vermont prohibited students from citing Wikipedia in papers, and a few other schools followed. At local colleges, while no school has announced an official ban, some individual professors are taking the lead and curtailing students' usage of Wikipedia."

source: http://www.goupstate.com/article/200704 ... 051/NEWS01
Top
User avatar
Silver
Active Member
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:15 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Hercules

Post by Silver »

ElCapuccino wrote:
Neojapan wrote:
satman83 wrote:the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:


i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong. 8)



it's not always accurate.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Lounge”