Boy, 8, played violent video game, killed 90-year-old woman

[Bartic]

I... I just... I don't even...

[Draquish]

>Alcohol is set for 21+(U.S.).
>Parents let child drink.
>8 year old goes on drunken binge.
>Blame Bacardi.
>????
>Profit.

[Fiction]

That's why games are rated. And an 8 year old should not be playing 17/18+ rated game. So, in this case, game is not to blame.

Of course.. But "playing a video game minutes before" he shot her.
Well, why didn't he picked up the gun before... he played the game?

Do we even know the circumstances? Who the hell even reads these articles? It's always best to just argue off the sensationalized title.

To answer your question, he didn't shoot her before playing, because he didn't know how to use a gun to kill someone, until he played the game. Which once empowered by this knowledge, it'd be a crime not to use his new found skills.

[omier]

>Alcohol is set for 21+(U.S.).
>Parents let child drink.
>8 year old goes on drunken binge.
>Blame Bacardi.
>????
>Profit.

21+ for alcohol makes no sense, considering other age restrictions in the U.S.

[*BlackFox]

he didn't shoot her before playing, because he didn't know how to use a gun to kill someone, until he played the game

Uh, yeah, right there. Just saying! Btw: Many people "actually read the article!"

[Blindfire]

If an 8 year old is allowed to play GTA IV then they are probably also allowed to have a BB gun.

[Baconz]

Of course.. But "playing a video game minutes before" he shot her.
Well, why didn't he picked up the gun before... he played the game?

Are you even reading the other posts?