New Scientific Discovery - Faster than light

[omier]

Isn't there a theory say that if you can go faster than light, then you can travel to the past?

um well no

Yes there is.

[TheDrop]

Apparently proven untrue (math error)
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/17/reme ... -forget-e/

Einstein is still God (or a specimen with ancestors that had a genetic mutation which caused high intelligence and was passed down over generations as the high intelligence was an adaptation that allowed them to survive and reproduce)

Isn't there a theory say that if you can go faster than light, then you can travel to the past?

um well no
if you travel fast enough and far enough away from earth and happen to look back with a extremely high powered telescope you could theoretically see dinosaurs
however were talking about getting millions of light years away in a much shorter amount of time
but yes it would be perfectly true that you could SEE the past however you could never visit it
and about this finding it is still in a very early stage however i do believe it to be possible to travel faster than light we just need to find a way and i do believe that there are particles that do not obey the common laws of physics

I have always wondered about Silo's point. I can think of a way in which you could travel to the future (continually spin around the earth at > speed of light so you somehow get to someplace that technically hasnt happened yet). But if you go the other way of earth's spin maybe then...
Or does it even work that way lols.

Isn't there a theory say that if you can go faster than light, then you can travel to the past?

Maybe, maybe not. But even if you could, who would want to? lulz

i would, if i could go back to when civilisation is just starting to emerge id set things in play for a better more united world, no singling out those who are different and NO RELIGION, religion can be in some way associated with everything bad thats ever happened on this planet even if its a loose affliation. nazi's where very christian, 11/9 (im british nothing happened on 9/11 here) was extreamists, just think of something even the simple reality of people dying of things we could cure if allowed to do certain things that are deemed against gods will or mormons who dont want blood to be taken, so yeh id go the past, id also remove currency like in star trek as in theory it could work then again communism in theory works what kills it is money and power but if you go the past you can put all this in motion not to mention what you know of modern tech even the stupid people know enough about science and tech to put people in the distant past a few years ahead of what they should be naturally, im not a genius but i know how a engine works, i know how to make simple circuits and how to generate electic etc anyways i digress going the past is the best thing you can do but depending how time works (which non of us really do) theres no garentee you will exist for long after making these changes unless time splinters into a different timeline then your ok and so will our reality

Holy shit
I usually dont care about grammar/etc but this is a huge clusterfck of a paragraph.

[NuclearSilo]

Isn't there a theory say that if you can go faster than light, then you can travel to the past?

Maybe, maybe not. But even if you could, who would want to? lulz

i would, if i could go back to when civilisation is just starting to emerge id set things in play for a better more united world, no singling out those who are different and NO RELIGION, religion can be in some way associated with everything bad thats ever happened on this planet even if its a loose affliation. nazi's where very christian, 11/9 (im british nothing happened on 9/11 here) was extreamists, just think of something even the simple reality of people dying of things we could cure if allowed to do certain things that are deemed against gods will or mormons who dont want blood to be taken, so yeh id go the past, id also remove currency like in star trek as in theory it could work then again communism in theory works what kills it is money and power but if you go the past you can put all this in motion not to mention what you know of modern tech even the stupid people know enough about science and tech to put people in the distant past a few years ahead of what they should be naturally, im not a genius but i know how a engine works, i know how to make simple circuits and how to generate electic etc anyways i digress going the past is the best thing you can do but depending how time works (which non of us really do) theres no garentee you will exist for long after making these changes unless time splinters into a different timeline then your ok and so will our reality

First: separate sentences with points and capitalize letters
Second: you would probably, ruin the planet faster

You alone can't kill the faith of millions of people. Because it's the only thing people can can cling on when they are struggling to die. One is starving, thirsting in the desert don't just call for someone for help. Because deep down inside, they know that there are barely no one in the desert. Faith is what to give them hope. Hope is the key, they need someone to count on. A hero, superman perhaps?

The point is it's not the the idea of religion which is bad, it's the people behind it used it as motive. I could say the same for politicians created movements to "destroy" people's life. Their motive isn't bad, it's logic, yet it destroys something.

Technology or high-tech can give people only comfort. It doesn't teach people the moral, how to treat others well nor how to deal with over population issue. When humans live in wealth, they tend to breed more, until a point that they realize there won't be enough resource for everyone. Then come the starvation, people will rob and steal and the evil start emerging.

Living on mountains, in a small village, people tend to live in peace over living in a city, with knowledge and comfort, etc...

[TheDrop]

Apparently the same lab tried it out again (with a different method)and they got the same results
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15791236