Obama Orders Assassination

[Love]

We still question Obama's, the government, or any politician's character .

Us ftw for sure, lets vote those good people into office so they can give us those things we don't already posses, meaning our freedom, our money, the civil rules we want to live by, etc.

Remember is not our money, is not our freedom, we need them to get a hold of all those things back, they will absolutely not toy with us, they won't stand idle while we beg for that which we apparently lost while they "may or may not" will be taking everything they can from us.



a more appropriate gif would be I love modern civilization but I don't have the skills to create that.

[Mirosuke]

lol gj

[William-CL]

HOW MANY of you actually read what that terrorist was involved in?

9/11
Army base shooting
Crotch bomb guy

And those are the ones that they know about. This is NOT anything New because this was put into action 9/14/01 3 days after 9/11.

The Obama administration justifies the policy of targeting US citizens for murder by citing the September 14, 2001 congressional act, the Authorization to Use Military Force. Passed three days after the September 11 attacks, the measure allowed the US president, from that moment forth, "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

The only problem is Obama has the guts to do it. It's not some form of conspiracy because this was all made public so that goes right out the window. If it was some mass conspiracy they have already failed before the fact has even happened yet.

I Myself am ok with this with one exception. They say "allegedly a lot for targeting someone for assassination.

[Love]

HOW MANY of you actually read what that terrorist was involved in?

9/11
Army base shooting
Crotch bomb guy

And those are the ones that they know about. This is NOT anything New because this was put into action 9/14/01 3 days after 9/11.

The Obama administration justifies the policy of targeting US citizens for murder by citing the September 14, 2001 congressional act, the Authorization to Use Military Force. Passed three days after the September 11 attacks, the measure allowed the US president, from that moment forth, "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

The only problem is Obama has the guts to do it. It's not some form of conspiracy because this was all made public so that goes right out the window. If it was some mass conspiracy they have already failed before the fact has even happened yet.

I Myself am ok with this with one exception. They say "allegedly a lot for targeting someone for assassination.

Ya ! You tell them what your friends from the government informed you, just like when we invaded Iraq, fu ck ya, kill all those damn terrorists.

Code: Select all

Pirates ? Not against the accidental USA navy ship that just happen to be passing by the middle of fuc king nowhere,

9/11 ? The fuc king 3rd building crumble from the heat ! what are you fuc king retarded, of course things work that way. Explosions reports and the many caught on tape ? stop being anti patriotic you fu cking scum !

USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[XemnasXD]

HOW MANY of you actually read what that terrorist was involved in?

9/11
Army base shooting
Crotch bomb guy

And those are the ones that they know about. This is NOT anything New because this was put into action 9/14/01 3 days after 9/11.

The Obama administration justifies the policy of targeting US citizens for murder by citing the September 14, 2001 congressional act, the Authorization to Use Military Force. Passed three days after the September 11 attacks, the measure allowed the US president, from that moment forth, "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

The only problem is Obama has the guts to do it. It's not some form of conspiracy because this was all made public so that goes right out the window. If it was some mass conspiracy they have already failed before the fact has even happened yet.

I Myself am ok with this with one exception. They say "allegedly a lot for targeting someone for assassination.

they say allegedly alot in the articles you posted...the BBC makes it very clear the the man has been connected with two terrorist incidents and is recruiting for Al-Quaeda...

[William-CL]

Omg.. You guys misunderstood me lol. I know they say Allegedly, but that doesn't mean I don't think he was responsible . . . I meant that the way they make it sound like he could be innocent and that is just ridiculous. They do indeed make it clear that he has been connected. The way they use allegedly makes it look like they don't really know though and would carry out the assassination anyways making them look bad. I am blaming the person that wrote the articles, not the information supplied.

@Love . If you think I was being anti patriotic you are the fu cking retard... I was agreeing that mother fuc ker needs to die for his crimes against the US..

[Love]

@Love . If you think I was being anti patriotic you are the fu cking retard... I was agreeing that mother fuc ker needs to die for his crimes against the US..

I lol'd, ya being anti patriotic is a concern.

[XemnasXD]

Omg.. You guys misunderstood me lol. I know they say Allegedly, but that doesn't mean I don't think he was responsible . . . I meant that the way they make it sound like he could be innocent and that is just ridiculous. They do indeed make it clear that he has been connected. The way they use allegedly makes it look like they don't really know though and would carry out the assassination anyways making them look bad. I am blaming the person that wrote the articles, not the information supplied.

then why didn't you post them from a better news source..kind of ironic that you disliked the authors tone because it was misleading then you posted it to us and are surprised that we think you're trying to miss lead us...

wait thats not ironic thats just stupid...

-_-

[*BlackFox]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

[William-CL]

Omg.. You guys misunderstood me lol. I know they say Allegedly, but that doesn't mean I don't think he was responsible . . . I meant that the way they make it sound like he could be innocent and that is just ridiculous. They do indeed make it clear that he has been connected. The way they use allegedly makes it look like they don't really know though and would carry out the assassination anyways making them look bad. I am blaming the person that wrote the articles, not the information supplied.

then why didn't you post them from a better news source..kind of ironic that you disliked the authors tone because it was misleading then you posted it to us and are surprised that we think you're trying to miss lead us...

wait thats not ironic thats just stupid...

-_-

yea.. ok.. BBC isn't a good enough source?... I posted this and explained that I simply didn't like how they say allegedly a lot. Not my fault your impotent mind mistook what I said and turned it into what you think I said.

[peex]

Code: Select all

[William-CL]

Code: Select all

Pure Win!

[dom]

Code: Select all

Pure Win!

Code: Select all

[XemnasXD]

yea.. ok.. BBC isn't a good enough source?... I posted this and explained that I simply didn't like how they say allegedly a lot. Not my fault your impotent mind mistook what I said and turned it into what you think I said.

Oh im sorry, i didn't know you posted BBC articles in your original post, you know the one where you actually copy and pasted the article so it was most likely the first thing people read and saw as they came in the thread. Whats that? You only posted a BBC one because someone else asked for a credible news link? Well if you knew BBC was credible and those other articles were obviously misleading why didn't you just post the BBC one in the first place? Whats that? You didn't think of that? And now you're trying to shift fault like you didn't originally post two misleading articles and were ready to leave it at that?

...you're on a roll kid

[Love]

yea.. ok.. BBC isn't a good enough source?... I posted this and explained that I simply didn't like how they say allegedly a lot. Not my fault your impotent mind mistook what I said and turned it into what you think I said.

Oh im sorry, i didn't know you posted BBC articles in your original post, you know the one where you actually copy and pasted the article so it was most likely the first thing people read and saw as they came in the thread. Whats that? You only posted a BBC one because someone else asked for a credible news link? Well if you knew BBC was credible and those other articles were obviously misleading why didn't you just post the BBC one in the first place? Whats that? You didn't think of that? And now you're trying to shift fault like you didn't originally post two misleading articles and were ready to leave it at that?

...you're on a roll kid

Why are you attacking him dude ? We are clearly in a time of war, we need to be together and trust in our president; you know what, I think you are unpatriotic, people like you are the exact reason why we were attacked in 9/11 and if you don't like it here you honestly need to go live elsewhere.

[Jstar1]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

I think if theres plenty of evidence that someone is a killer or helps kill innocent people, I see no problem in blowing him up with a missile. That bullshit about "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is so ideal, its almost disgusting. People who think its ok to kill white people because its "a task from god" should never be given a 2nd chance, because its hopeless for them. We should give 2nd chances to 1st time offenders as much as possible but for the most extreme cases, never.

Obama is doing the right thing, paint a target on the fucker's head and nail him.

[Love]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

I think if theres plenty of evidence that someone is a killer or helps kill innocent people, I see no problem in blowing him up with a missile. That bullshit about "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is so ideal, its almost disgusting. People who think its ok to kill white people because its "a task from god" should never be given a 2nd chance, because its hopeless for them. We should give 2nd chances to 1st time offenders as much as possible but for the most extreme cases, never.

Obama is doing the right thing, paint a target on the fucker's head and nail him.

You are absolutely right, the problem lies in these people pointing a finger, us knowing that this findger was pointed for bullshit reasons and them then proceeding to rob our pockets and kill the other side still, it's very much a different story.

[Barotix]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

I think if theres plenty of evidence that someone is a killer or helps kill innocent people, I see no problem in blowing him up with a missile. That bullshit about "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is so ideal, its almost disgusting. People who think its ok to kill white people because its "a task from god" should never be given a 2nd chance, because its hopeless for them. We should give 2nd chances to 1st time offenders as much as possible but for the most extreme cases, never.

Obama is doing the right thing, paint a target on the fucker's head and nail him.

[yogi bear]
Hey Boo Boo, once you go down that rabbit hole there ain't no going back. You hear me now, Boo Boo? All we can do is see how deep it takes us.
[/yogi bear]

[TheDrop]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

I think if theres plenty of evidence that someone is a killer or helps kill innocent people, I see no problem in blowing him up with a missile. That bullshit about "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is so ideal, its almost disgusting. People who think its ok to kill white people because its "a task from god" should never be given a 2nd chance, because its hopeless for them. We should give 2nd chances to 1st time offenders as much as possible but for the most extreme cases, never.

Obama is doing the right thing, paint a target on the fucker's head and nail him.

the thing is, he is a US citizen, and the executive branch ordering an execution of someone without being tried would undermine the judicial branch and set a precedent that gives the president powers that they shouldnt have...

[Barotix]

This is so wrong and scary.
Seriously, No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.

I think if theres plenty of evidence that someone is a killer or helps kill innocent people, I see no problem in blowing him up with a missile. That bullshit about "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is so ideal, its almost disgusting. People who think its ok to kill white people because its "a task from god" should never be given a 2nd chance, because its hopeless for them. We should give 2nd chances to 1st time offenders as much as possible but for the most extreme cases, never.

Obama is doing the right thing, paint a target on the fucker's head and nail him.

the thing is, he is a US citizen, and the executive branch ordering an execution of someone without being tried would undermine the judicial branch and set a precedent that gives the president powers that they shouldnt have...

Yo, I think we're past that point, brah.

[Love]

^
lol, nice one.

[William-CL]

This hasn't been an issue or discussed until Obama actually ordered one. The congressional act was put into motion Sept 14/2001. In short, if they are Suspected of having any involvement in 9/11, they die.. lol as simplified as it gets. The Bush administration never assassinated anyone, but he took us to war killing more US Citizens than a SINGLE assassination of a Terrorist. I know that no due process is a slippery slope and hopefully this doesn't become a common thing.

[Love]

This hasn't been an issue or discussed until Obama actually ordered one. The congressional act was put into motion Sept 14/2001. In short, if they are Suspected of having any involvement in 9/11, they die.. lol as simplified as it gets. The Bush administration never assassinated anyone, but he took us to war killing more US Citizens than a SINGLE assassination of a Terrorist. I know that no due process is a slippery slope and hopefully this doesn't become a common thing.

stop playing the game...