How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it!
A Question About Particle Accelerators
-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
A Question About Particle Accelerators
Okay, so here's my question:
How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it!
How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it!
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
- chickenfeather
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:24 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Origin Online
- Contact:
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
It probably has something to do with how long they can sustain those temperatures. If it is a few nanoseconds, then cooling shouldn't be too big a deal(not to say it doesn't get really hot). It's kinda like how you can wave your hand through a fire really fast and not get burned.
Origin Online
EdgeworthScoundrels
EdgeworthScoundrels
-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
I suppose..but, i mean, at temps 100,000x greater than the sun, it still seems weird to me haha
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
hmm, that can make some sense on some level...a lot of the time they are dealing with up and down quarks whose are esentially massless. Well, not really but, on these scales, they might as well be.
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
E = mc2 ... when you have an essentially massless object, the energy doesn't get too big either, doesn't it? 
Note that at my age of 15 I do not fully understand Einstein's formula. I can't figure out a physical, practical application. All I said above was because it sort of made sense to me that an object with small mass can't hold an awful lot of energy, and the formula appeared to contain a link between the two.
Note that at my age of 15 I do not fully understand Einstein's formula. I can't figure out a physical, practical application. All I said above was because it sort of made sense to me that an object with small mass can't hold an awful lot of energy, and the formula appeared to contain a link between the two.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
- crazyskwrls
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:16 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
i just learned about it in chem, a tokamak is used to heat up the tritium and hydrogen to 3,000,000k and fusion begins. can only sustain for like 5 seconds. it use strong magnetic field to contain the heat and it is HUGE

thnx Kraq
- PileOfMush
- Valued Member
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:55 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Stress wrote:Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.
You get a (:::) for giving the correct answer!
Venus: Crush
Oasis: BuryMe
Oasis: BuryMe
- Morgoth
- Active Member
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:33 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
yes as said before, it probably uses an extremely powerful magnetic field to keep the hot stuff from touching the machine

- FireJammerXR
- Regular Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:46 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Oasis
- Contact:
- Silver0
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: 5 Mins Ahead
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Portable Plasma Coffee Mug
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia

we be in a utopia

- StealMySoda
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 5245
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:37 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
FireJammerXR wrote:tritium=hydrogen
No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.
Ooh, I got a sexy ex-staff title!
-
123noob
- Active Member
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
the reason why the container aren't melting because there is generally no activity or very activity in there that doesn't generate heat that much. Unless when a trigger activates those activities (molecules bumbing into one another) that is when things get crazy.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
- Rainigul
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4490
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:43 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Pacific
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Someone alert Doctor Octavius, his secret plan is getting out...
I believe it has to do with the mass of the object, if it was a few times larger, it could potentially self sustain itself (No, I'm not getting that from spiderman, I learnt alittle bit about it, but I don't like my science teacher, so I wasn't really paying attention)
I believe it has to do with the mass of the object, if it was a few times larger, it could potentially self sustain itself (No, I'm not getting that from spiderman, I learnt alittle bit about it, but I don't like my science teacher, so I wasn't really paying attention)
-
agent420
- Active Member
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:35 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: off topic
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!


<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
StealMySoda wrote:FireJammerXR wrote:tritium=hydrogen
No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.
Yes. That's correct.
Deuterium = Isotope of hydrogen with 1 neutron rather than 0. D20 = Heavy Water, used with fission nuclear reactors.
Tritium = Isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0. T20 = Super Heavy Water, probably used with future fusion nuclear reactors.
I hope I remembered my facts correctly
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
- toastedsock
- Casual Member
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Redsea
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Particle accelerators are the devil and use dark magic to contain the highly explosive energies. It's all a government plot to keep us from developing a mega death ray that could destroy the commies. Just by mentioning the words particle accelerator you have been marked for death by a secret organization of ninja pirate demon monkeys.

Thanks to Hershey for the freakin awesome sig!!!!

- XemnasXD
- Chronicle Writer
- Posts: 9841
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: US - Illidan
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
agent420 wrote:how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!
ahhhh beat me to it....

signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
JacksColon wrote:Okay, so here's my question:
How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it!
I dont know nothing about them but with simple logic I can say they got some very good coolers
- cuchulainn
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Troy
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Basically the way these things work is:
They have a huge (many kilometers) circular construct where everything takes place. They use "beams" of particles such as protons that are accelerated to extremely high velocities reaching a huge amount of energy. Since protons have a charge, they can be steered using electric and magnetic fields. These have to be tuned very precisely in order to keep the beams from hitting the walls of the accelerator because at the energy levels required in the experiments they are conducting, if the beam were to become uncontrolled it would be catastrophic and damage the machine and delay further experiments for years.
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the particle accelerator that has been in the news lately. It's the one that's scheduled to come online in the next year or so. They have a couple of different points on the path of the accelerator that they have detectors for their experiments. The beams are sent around and around and at certain points, they are deliberately made to cross so that there is some collision of particles. Head on collisions aren't too frequent, but there are many glancing hits. The head on collisions are the ones that give very good data.
In chemistry class, you may have heard of the "Law of Conservation of Mass" where you could neither create nor destroy matter. However, in particle physics, it's more correctly the "Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy" where Einstein's famous, e=mc^2 equation is the bridge from mass to energy and vice versa. Essentially, they are hoping for some very very very very high energy collisions between protons that would have tons of energy which (if they're lucky) will create some new particles that have been theorized to exist such as the Higgs Boson. The LHC greatly surpasses the energy levels of previous accelerators and they are hoping this increase in energy results in some new findings.
My physics professor keeps going on about how "it's an exciting time for particle physics" and if they end up finding something new and cool, he's definitely right XD
They have a huge (many kilometers) circular construct where everything takes place. They use "beams" of particles such as protons that are accelerated to extremely high velocities reaching a huge amount of energy. Since protons have a charge, they can be steered using electric and magnetic fields. These have to be tuned very precisely in order to keep the beams from hitting the walls of the accelerator because at the energy levels required in the experiments they are conducting, if the beam were to become uncontrolled it would be catastrophic and damage the machine and delay further experiments for years.
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the particle accelerator that has been in the news lately. It's the one that's scheduled to come online in the next year or so. They have a couple of different points on the path of the accelerator that they have detectors for their experiments. The beams are sent around and around and at certain points, they are deliberately made to cross so that there is some collision of particles. Head on collisions aren't too frequent, but there are many glancing hits. The head on collisions are the ones that give very good data.
In chemistry class, you may have heard of the "Law of Conservation of Mass" where you could neither create nor destroy matter. However, in particle physics, it's more correctly the "Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy" where Einstein's famous, e=mc^2 equation is the bridge from mass to energy and vice versa. Essentially, they are hoping for some very very very very high energy collisions between protons that would have tons of energy which (if they're lucky) will create some new particles that have been theorized to exist such as the Higgs Boson. The LHC greatly surpasses the energy levels of previous accelerators and they are hoping this increase in energy results in some new findings.
My physics professor keeps going on about how "it's an exciting time for particle physics" and if they end up finding something new and cool, he's definitely right XD
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.


- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Thanks for the info, chuch 
Good to know.
Good to know.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
- Sharasss
- Casual Member
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:29 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Cabal EU
Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
Yea, and I've heard some rumours from one Russian professor, that when particles collide at nearly the speed of light, a Time Hole can be created by accident, though for only a few ps (1*10^-15 seconds) or so, and you can travel in time
(LOL, he is INSANE!!)
I wish I could see the Collide sometime... One should be launched a few weeks after this post in Geneva, heard it from my Physics teach.
I wish I could see the Collide sometime... One should be launched a few weeks after this post in Geneva, heard it from my Physics teach.

