A Question About Particle Accelerators

Anything else. Post a funny site or tell us about yourself. Discuss current events or whatever else you want. Post off topic threads here.
Post Reply
JacksColon
Advanced Member
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Rome

A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by JacksColon »

Okay, so here's my question:

How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it! :shock:
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J

User avatar
chickenfeather
Frequent Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:24 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Origin Online
Contact:

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by chickenfeather »

It probably has something to do with how long they can sustain those temperatures. If it is a few nanoseconds, then cooling shouldn't be too big a deal(not to say it doesn't get really hot). It's kinda like how you can wave your hand through a fire really fast and not get burned.
Origin Online
EdgeworthScoundrels

JacksColon
Advanced Member
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Rome

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by JacksColon »

I suppose..but, i mean, at temps 100,000x greater than the sun, it still seems weird to me haha
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J

User avatar
Stress
Ex-Staff
Posts: 4599
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Stress »

Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.

JacksColon
Advanced Member
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Rome

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by JacksColon »

hmm, that can make some sense on some level...a lot of the time they are dealing with up and down quarks whose are esentially massless. Well, not really but, on these scales, they might as well be.
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J

User avatar
Stress
Ex-Staff
Posts: 4599
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Stress »

E = mc2 ... when you have an essentially massless object, the energy doesn't get too big either, doesn't it? :)

Note that at my age of 15 I do not fully understand Einstein's formula. I can't figure out a physical, practical application. All I said above was because it sort of made sense to me that an object with small mass can't hold an awful lot of energy, and the formula appeared to contain a link between the two.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.

User avatar
crazyskwrls
Advanced Member
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:16 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by crazyskwrls »

i just learned about it in chem, a tokamak is used to heat up the tritium and hydrogen to 3,000,000k and fusion begins. can only sustain for like 5 seconds. it use strong magnetic field to contain the heat and it is HUGE
Image Image
thnx Kraq

User avatar
PileOfMush
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by PileOfMush »

Stress wrote:Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.


You get a (:::) for giving the correct answer!
Venus: Crush
Oasis: BuryMe

User avatar
Morgoth
Active Member
Posts: 854
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:33 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Morgoth »

yes as said before, it probably uses an extremely powerful magnetic field to keep the hot stuff from touching the machine
Image

User avatar
FireJammerXR
Regular Member
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Oasis
Contact:

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by FireJammerXR »

tritium=hydrogen
Image

User avatar
Silver0
Advanced Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 5 Mins Ahead

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Silver0 »

Portable Plasma Coffee Mug
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image

User avatar
StealMySoda
Ex-Staff
Posts: 5245
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:37 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by StealMySoda »

FireJammerXR wrote:tritium=hydrogen

No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.
Ooh, I got a sexy ex-staff title!

123noob
Active Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:26 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by 123noob »

the reason why the container aren't melting because there is generally no activity or very activity in there that doesn't generate heat that much. Unless when a trigger activates those activities (molecules bumbing into one another) that is when things get crazy.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Rainigul
Senior Member
Posts: 4490
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pacific

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Rainigul »

Someone alert Doctor Octavius, his secret plan is getting out...

I believe it has to do with the mass of the object, if it was a few times larger, it could potentially self sustain itself (No, I'm not getting that from spiderman, I learnt alittle bit about it, but I don't like my science teacher, so I wasn't really paying attention)

agent420
Active Member
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:35 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by agent420 »

how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!
Image
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>

User avatar
Stress
Ex-Staff
Posts: 4599
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Stress »

StealMySoda wrote:
FireJammerXR wrote:tritium=hydrogen

No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.


Yes. That's correct.

Deuterium = Isotope of hydrogen with 1 neutron rather than 0. D20 = Heavy Water, used with fission nuclear reactors.

Tritium = Isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0. T20 = Super Heavy Water, probably used with future fusion nuclear reactors.


I hope I remembered my facts correctly :)
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.

User avatar
toastedsock
Casual Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:45 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Redsea

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by toastedsock »

Particle accelerators are the devil and use dark magic to contain the highly explosive energies. It's all a government plot to keep us from developing a mega death ray that could destroy the commies. Just by mentioning the words particle accelerator you have been marked for death by a secret organization of ninja pirate demon monkeys.
Image
Thanks to Hershey for the freakin awesome sig!!!!

Image

User avatar
XemnasXD
Chronicle Writer
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: US - Illidan

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by XemnasXD »

agent420 wrote:how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!
Image



ahhhh beat me to it....
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~

Valkasdar
Valued Member
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:03 am

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Valkasdar »

JacksColon wrote:Okay, so here's my question:

How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it! :shock:



I dont know nothing about them but with simple logic I can say they got some very good coolers :P yes they do reach those temps but the coolers maybe keep the surface enough cool to not melt... :roll: and maybe use graphite for the insides surface or some sort of this :O dunno

User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by cuchulainn »

Basically the way these things work is:

They have a huge (many kilometers) circular construct where everything takes place. They use "beams" of particles such as protons that are accelerated to extremely high velocities reaching a huge amount of energy. Since protons have a charge, they can be steered using electric and magnetic fields. These have to be tuned very precisely in order to keep the beams from hitting the walls of the accelerator because at the energy levels required in the experiments they are conducting, if the beam were to become uncontrolled it would be catastrophic and damage the machine and delay further experiments for years.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the particle accelerator that has been in the news lately. It's the one that's scheduled to come online in the next year or so. They have a couple of different points on the path of the accelerator that they have detectors for their experiments. The beams are sent around and around and at certain points, they are deliberately made to cross so that there is some collision of particles. Head on collisions aren't too frequent, but there are many glancing hits. The head on collisions are the ones that give very good data.

In chemistry class, you may have heard of the "Law of Conservation of Mass" where you could neither create nor destroy matter. However, in particle physics, it's more correctly the "Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy" where Einstein's famous, e=mc^2 equation is the bridge from mass to energy and vice versa. Essentially, they are hoping for some very very very very high energy collisions between protons that would have tons of energy which (if they're lucky) will create some new particles that have been theorized to exist such as the Higgs Boson. The LHC greatly surpasses the energy levels of previous accelerators and they are hoping this increase in energy results in some new findings.

My physics professor keeps going on about how "it's an exciting time for particle physics" and if they end up finding something new and cool, he's definitely right XD
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

User avatar
Stress
Ex-Staff
Posts: 4599
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Stress »

Thanks for the info, chuch :)

Good to know.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.

User avatar
Sharasss
Casual Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Cabal EU

Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators

Post by Sharasss »

Yea, and I've heard some rumours from one Russian professor, that when particles collide at nearly the speed of light, a Time Hole can be created by accident, though for only a few ps (1*10^-15 seconds) or so, and you can travel in time :shock: (LOL, he is INSANE!!)

I wish I could see the Collide sometime... One should be launched a few weeks after this post in Geneva, heard it from my Physics teach.
Image
Cabal EU ~ SixthSense ~ Force Blader

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Lounge”