Worlds First Pregnant Man

Anything else. Post a funny site or tell us about yourself. Discuss current events or whatever else you want. Post off topic threads here.

Is this a good thing

No theres no need for it
16
38%
No it goes against my beliefs
10
24%
Yes ppl can/will benefit from it
3
7%
Its value is purely scientific
13
31%
 
Total votes: 42

Stormprobe
Frequent Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:39 am

Post by Stormprobe »

Locketart wrote:
Stormprobe wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:
Locketart wrote:Aside from the ethical reasons, if pregnant men can give birth to completely healthy babies, I see no problem with it. It would give couples a choice to who would carry the baby. Maybe there could be problems with the female: drinks, smokes, disease. This way the male could carry the baby and no teratogens would harm the fetus.


rational thinking...in 5 pages its so rare yet here you are




You all also forgot that what if the baby is a girl and it has to Much Testosterone Genes. Won't this mess up her gene's and cause her to be alot harrier then the other girl's To that sort . or am i wrong? lol


Have you ever taken a biology course?



No why? only 13
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Locketart
Advanced Member
Posts: 2119
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:12 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Post by Locketart »

I figured.
ImageImage

Stormprobe
Frequent Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:39 am

Post by Stormprobe »

Locketart wrote:I figured.



Why was i wrong =p ? lol
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Barotix
Ex-Staff
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Sand

Post by Barotix »

Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:
Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:
Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:Its against moral reasons. Just THINK for a moment. Does it SEEM right? NO!

Forget about "human rights" completely and think about it-does it SEEM right? NEVER.

Are you a Creationist?

I see you point from you prior post

and no I am pro evolution

that is why I support this research
until it is outlawed I will be behind it



what most people don't realize is that medicine was punishable by death before

but see where it has gotten us now?
somethings will get shot down other things wont


Why? What will it bring? What in hell's name will pregnant men bring? An endless, endless controversy? New laws to "protect" these "human" babies? Conflicts between such "human" kids and normal kids? Or what? Scientific benefits? Medical advances?

Or how about a new rift in society, just like gays have become? A new, new group of people ultimately, forever seperated from normal human beings?

That the kind of benefits this "research" will bring?

It is only what you make of it.
People who view other races as inferior only believe it because they want to.
For all we know, this could become one of the most beneficial advances in a long time.


Now youre just dragging this whole thing by its feet. You still havent said why its such a "good thing" for the world. How is it beneficial?

Couples who can not get pregnant
male couples who want to be able to have their own baby

all I'm saying is we shouldn't shun it until we see how it affects the world


atm it has no benefits, except for the 1 locktart stated.

overpopulation will kill any research for this.

atm a pregnant man is pointless.

the only reason i would support this is just 2 see if its possible.
other than that i dont see a point.

when we have a shortage of women.
or a majority of homosexual men [which would actually curb overpopulation, but pregnant dudes would increase the population so -_- SHIT]

then i can see this being used.

but pregnant dudes there is NOTHING MORALLY wrong with that,
its just different... thats all.

back in the day.

alot of people died, from natural causes... [ill-heatlh and all that shiz]
now people die from mostly old age, which imo is dumb.

the only things humans had left 2 control thier own population was war...

now with all this hippy peace shiz... our population is booming.

its a pile of bull.

i support a pregnant man because its interesting.
and SK i understand where your coming from... i understand... the chinese... korea... japan... vassels... mongols... wars... bad history BAD BLOOD between ya'll... [history FTW/L]

point is...
ATM it is POINTLESS.

i think we should make people concieve less...
or at least start some wars...

there are 2 many of us....
way 2 many...

lol i support genetic engineering... because it will destroy [almost] humans :)

imagine being able 2 order your child with anything.
and once they prove homosexuality is hereditary.../ chemical
and master genetic engineering..

well first off
more babies
and secondly LESS DIVERSE GENE POOL

that equals death.
any species whose gene pool is limited
shall perish.

Pregnant man ok i can live with that.
pregnant man ordering a child who will

be straight
have "asian" hair
green eyes
tan skin
female
double Ds
small waist
big hips
prefers non fatty foods
long legs
huge friggen bird wings oO
no abnormalities [mental and physical]

[yep people will order perfect boys and girls, this will lead 2 most people being basically the same.]

AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN EVERY1 IS THE SAME... [reletively the same]

EVOLUTION KILLS YOU :wink:
Maddening
Image

User avatar
XemnasXD
Chronicle Writer
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: US - Illidan

Post by XemnasXD »

for heaven sake barotix use paragraphs for once....
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~

Stormprobe
Frequent Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:39 am

Post by Stormprobe »

Barotix wrote:
Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:
Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:
Xyzzzy wrote:
southkorea321 wrote:Its against moral reasons. Just THINK for a moment. Does it SEEM right? NO!

Forget about "human rights" completely and think about it-does it SEEM right? NEVER.

Are you a Creationist?

I see you point from you prior post

and no I am pro evolution

that is why I support this research
until it is outlawed I will be behind it



what most people don't realize is that medicine was punishable by death before

but see where it has gotten us now?
somethings will get shot down other things wont


Why? What will it bring? What in hell's name will pregnant men bring? An endless, endless controversy? New laws to "protect" these "human" babies? Conflicts between such "human" kids and normal kids? Or what? Scientific benefits? Medical advances?

Or how about a new rift in society, just like gays have become? A new, new group of people ultimately, forever seperated from normal human beings?

That the kind of benefits this "research" will bring?

It is only what you make of it.
People who view other races as inferior only believe it because they want to.
For all we know, this could become one of the most beneficial advances in a long time.


Now youre just dragging this whole thing by its feet. You still havent said why its such a "good thing" for the world. How is it beneficial?

Couples who can not get pregnant
male couples who want to be able to have their own baby

all I'm saying is we shouldn't shun it until we see how it affects the world


atm it has no benefits, except for the 1 locktart stated.

overpopulation will kill any research for this.

atm a pregnant man is pointless.

the only reason i would support this is just 2 see if its possible.
other than that i dont see a point.

when we have a shortage of women.
or a majority of homosexual men [which would actually curb overpopulation, but pregnant dudes would increase the population so -_- SHIT]

then i can see this being used.

but pregnant dudes there is NOTHING MORALLY wrong with that,
its just different... thats all.

back in the day.

alot of people died, from natural causes... [ill-heatlh and all that shiz]
now people die from mostly old age, which imo is dumb.

the only things humans had left 2 control thier own population was war...

now with all this hippy peace shiz... our population is booming.

its a pile of bull.

i support a pregnant man because its interesting.
and SK i understand where your coming from... i understand... the chinese... korea... japan... vassels... mongols... wars... bad history BAD BLOOD between ya'll... [history FTW/L]

point is...
ATM it is POINTLESS.

i think we should make people concieve less...
or at least start some wars...

there are 2 many of us....
way 2 many...

lol i support genetic engineering... because it will destroy [almost] humans :)

imagine being able 2 order your child with anything.
and once they prove homosexuality is hereditary.../ chemical
and master genetic engineering..

well first off
more babies
and secondly LESS DIVERSE GENE POOL

that equals death.
any species whose gene pool is limited
shall perish.

Pregnant man ok i can live with that.
pregnant man ordering a child who will

be straight
have "asian" hair
green eyes
tan skin
female
double Ds
small waist
big hips
prefers non fatty foods
long legs
huge friggen bird wings oO
no abnormalities [mental and physical]

[yep people will order perfect boys and girls, this will lead 2 most people being basically the same.]

AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN EVERY1 IS THE SAME... [reletively the same]

EVOLUTION KILLS YOU :wink:




Ahh thx for bringing this up. Also what about the PedaFiles? What if they order a girl to tehre spculations? AN if this male pregnancy did you happen you know that there are those pervert's who do it with there OffSpring
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Elikapeka
Active Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:18 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Azteca

Post by Elikapeka »

Barotix wrote:human animal hybrids AKA chimeras

I'm not trying to start anything, but I don't want people reading this and thinking we've got interspecies folk walking about.

Chimarism has absolutely nothing to do with two different animals sharing blood or being hybrid. It's when an individual of a species has two blood types within itself. Happens separately with humans, cows, cats, dogs...what have you. Not in-between.

On Topic; Even though the article is fake, my personal opinion is that it's wrong to even consider it. It's not evolution, it's blatant scientific mutation. Something we as a species shouldn't tamper with. Wrong on so many levels.

StuckUP
Frequent Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by StuckUP »

I've been thinking this article and now that I've thought about it, I changed my mind. I think that science should leave certain aspects of nature alone. Nature has already given us much and we still are not satisfied with it and now we are destroying nature. We need to stop taking nature for granted and actually start to appreciate it. I take it that some of you have seen what nature can do in the power of human hands. It will be hell of course because nature wasn't made to be tamed. If we hadn't messed with nature then we would have all these crisis going on in the world today.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
TOloseGT
Forum Legend
Posts: 7129
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:03 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus
Contact:

Post by TOloseGT »

by nature, u must not mean sea horses then? cuz male seahorses carry eggs.
ImageImage

StuckUP
Frequent Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by StuckUP »

TOloseGT wrote:by nature, u must not mean sea horses then? cuz male seahorses carry eggs.


yea but nature did that not science
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Silver0
Advanced Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 5 Mins Ahead

Post by Silver0 »

StuckUP wrote:I've been thinking this article and now that I've thought about it, I changed my mind. I think that science should leave certain aspects of nature alone. Nature has already given us much and we still are not satisfied with it and now we are destroying nature. We need to stop taking nature for granted and actually start to appreciate it. I take it that some of you have seen what nature can do in the power of human hands. It will be hell of course because nature wasn't made to be tamed. If we hadn't messed with nature then we would have all these crisis going on in the world today.

its called evolution if your so in favor of nature then legalize drugs and rape since those where part of nature , also killing, killing each other is nature and while ur at it add 2 nature abandoning unwanted children thats nature. killing animals is nature what else?
uhmm men beating on women
also child abuse and nature cant be owning a computer this computer is generated by electricity which was generated by burning coal turn ur pc off thats not nature it didnt come form the ground.
nature is ur enviroment how you grow and change if we find a way 2 be a single splitting cell and science can achive this then it could fix all these problems, if you open ur third eye you start 2 realized alot of things ppl do r for sex sub or awake. if we can change it we can make it nature


we get disease doctors shouldnt
exist b/c maybe ppl should die cuz they got a natural disease if your so infavor of nature no medical fields lets go back 2 living in a cave if your so nature l i dont c u promoting this side of nature we changed
Last edited by Silver0 on Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image

User avatar
TOloseGT
Forum Legend
Posts: 7129
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:03 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus
Contact:

Post by TOloseGT »

i believe in choice. so if a guy wants to go thru wit pregnancy, all the power to him.
ImageImage

StuckUP
Frequent Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by StuckUP »

Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:I've been thinking this article and now that I've thought about it, I changed my mind. I think that science should leave certain aspects of nature alone. Nature has already given us much and we still are not satisfied with it and now we are destroying nature. We need to stop taking nature for granted and actually start to appreciate it. I take it that some of you have seen what nature can do in the power of human hands. It will be hell of course because nature wasn't made to be tamed. If we hadn't messed with nature then we would have all these crisis going on in the world today.

its called evolution if your so in favor of nature then legalize drugs and rape since those where part of nature , also killing, killing each other is nature and while ur at it add 2 nature abandoning unwanted children thats nature. killing animals is nature what else?
uhmm men beating on women
also child abuse and nature cant be owning a computer this computer is generated by electricity which was generated by burning coal turn ur pc off thats not nature it didnt come form the ground.
nature is ur enviroment how you grow and change if we find a way 2 be a single splitting cell and science can achive this then it could fix all these problems, if you open ur third eye you start 2 realized alot of things ppl do r for sex sub or awake


-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Silver0
Advanced Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 5 Mins Ahead

Post by Silver0 »

StuckUP wrote:
-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.

hypocrite if we leave nature as it is then illness shouldnt be cured
animals do kill.rape.and destroy each other r u blind,and curiosity got us where we are at you wouldnt exist if we let nature be
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image

StuckUP
Frequent Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by StuckUP »

Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.

hypocrite if we leave nature as it is then illness shouldnt be cured
animals do kill each other r u blind,and curiosity got us where we are at you wouldnt exist if we let nature be


animals kill each other only when needed, and notice in my speech I said certain aspects of nature should be left alone. And yes curiosity got us where we are but must we pry and poke at things that are not our business?
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

nicko9000
Common Member
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:51 pm

Post by nicko9000 »

Shadowman20818 wrote:They're also doing research for asexual women, soon humans will be like trees, but since we're the only race to have sex for fun anyways, we'll still need men and women.

About the science:

It's actually very interesting that they would mention hemorrhage as that was the first thing I though of. Women through pregnancy develop to prepare them for pregnacy. (Most obvious being wider hips) I'm surprised the body did not react critically to the rise in estrogen and gonadotropin. Similarly it was weird that the body did not attack the placenta and kill the baby.

Also, the info is scarce, seems a little fake.



Actually (sorry if this is already posted)

Dolphins have sex for pleasure aswell. 8)
<<banned from SRF for remaking a banned account. -SG>>

LadyBowie
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:08 am

Post by LadyBowie »

Arnold Schwarzenegger already did it.

User avatar
Silver0
Advanced Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 5 Mins Ahead

Post by Silver0 »

StuckUP wrote:
Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.

hypocrite if we leave nature as it is then illness shouldnt be cured
animals do kill each other r u blind,and curiosity got us where we are at you wouldnt exist if we let nature be


animals kill each other only when needed, and notice in my speech I said certain aspects of nature should be left alone. And yes curiosity got us where we are but must we pry and poke at things that are not our business?

rofl i bet if u had a cancer and the only cure was with stem cells u telling me ull refuse it since its against nature
dont cover 1 of ur eyes take it or leave it cant be ill take 50%
on these issues there is always exeptions but there is 2many ppl 2 sort them out
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image

StuckUP
Frequent Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:38 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by StuckUP »

Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.

hypocrite if we leave nature as it is then illness shouldnt be cured
animals do kill each other r u blind,and curiosity got us where we are at you wouldnt exist if we let nature be


animals kill each other only when needed, and notice in my speech I said certain aspects of nature should be left alone. And yes curiosity got us where we are but must we pry and poke at things that are not our business?

rofl i bet if u had a cancer and the only cure was with stem cells u telling me ull refuse it since its against nature
dont cover 1 of ur eyes take it or leave it cant be ill take 50%
on these issues there is always exeptions but there is 2many ppl 2 sort them out


you don't get my point and never will and you do almost anything to make me look bad so I'm done with this.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Silver0
Advanced Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:46 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 5 Mins Ahead

Post by Silver0 »

StuckUP wrote:
Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
Silver0 wrote:
StuckUP wrote:
-.- that is not apart of nature. If you weren't so ignorant and narrow minded you would see that the other animals don't kill and rape and blow up places. You twisted my point into a whole nother thing. I didn't say we shouldn't own a computer, or try to find a cure for illnesses i said we should accept nature as it is and leave it alone. We humans are very paranoid and we shun things we don't understand and because of that we are constantly trying to control things and trying to find out about everything. we should take the term curiosity killed the cat seriously.

hypocrite if we leave nature as it is then illness shouldnt be cured
animals do kill each other r u blind,and curiosity got us where we are at you wouldnt exist if we let nature be


animals kill each other only when needed, and notice in my speech I said certain aspects of nature should be left alone. And yes curiosity got us where we are but must we pry and poke at things that are not our business?

rofl i bet if u had a cancer and the only cure was with stem cells u telling me ull refuse it since its against nature
dont cover 1 of ur eyes take it or leave it cant be ill take 50%
on these issues there is always exeptions but there is 2many ppl 2 sort them out


you don't get my point and never will and you do almost anything to make me look bad so I'm done with this.

aww =( damm i get ur point and i some what agree with it myself its just look at the broad idea that who is 2 say you know what parts of nature we can change or not ,anyone in general imagen when ppl thought slvary was nature and not having slaves was against nature or stuff like these times change ppl change and with this new ideas and new thigns are created w/o curiosity and changing or trying 2 make them better we will never step ahead even if it goes against what ever moral laws some ppl have created in there mind
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image

User avatar
PB_and_J
Ex-Staff
Posts: 2639
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:18 am
Location: 4 hour jack sessions with stallowned

Post by PB_and_J »

Stormprobe wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:
Locketart wrote:Aside from the ethical reasons, if pregnant men can give birth to completely healthy babies, I see no problem with it. It would give couples a choice to who would carry the baby. Maybe there could be problems with the female: drinks, smokes, disease. This way the male could carry the baby and no teratogens would harm the fetus.


rational thinking...in 5 pages its so rare yet here you are




You all also forgot that what if the baby is a girl and it has to Much Testosterone Genes. Won't this mess up her gene's and cause her to be alot harrier then the other girl's To that sort . or am i wrong? lol


Does that mean every child to this day that a woman delivered will have to much oesterogen? And this same argument goes to whoever said that the baby will be gay, is every child born from a female a lesbain?
Image

User avatar
Peety
Common Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:40 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Tibet

Post by Peety »

Image

Whos your daddy and what does he do?

PROOF that its real.
Image
Image
Image Blacklisted _ENDLESS_
bongOz
5x FS Glaiver

Sylhana
Veteran Member
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:05 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Babel

Post by Sylhana »

I dont feel like posting the processes involved before, during and after pregnancy. But for the uninitiated it is a worthwhile read. You'll quickly understand why it would be hard to mimic the processes in a male host.

About how science should/shouldnt meddle with nature, the simple answer is that science is the pure pursuit of knowledge. Scientists never question if we should/shouldnt, but if we could. Curiosity killed the cat, but its actions advanced feline behavior for survival.
<<banned from SRF for bot support. -SG>>

User avatar
Necrobat
Advanced Member
Posts: 2011
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:39 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Australia

Post by Necrobat »

Food for thought for some people if this were real.

We know that each parent donates one gene that determines a child's sex, with XX being for woman and XY being for men.

So what would happen if the child was YY? o.O If males could get pregnant to another male, this would be a severe problem, seeing we have no idea what it would be like.
Image

Luoma
Veteran Member
Posts: 3895
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:23 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Artists Corner & Aege

Post by Luoma »

"Junior" is really a crap movie
<<banned from SRF for proof of botting. -SG>>

User avatar
Innovacious
Advanced Member
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:24 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Post by Innovacious »

Necrobat wrote:Food for thought for some people if this were real.

We know that each parent donates one gene that determines a child's sex, with XX being for woman and XY being for men.

So what would happen if the child was YY? o.O If males could get pregnant to another male, this would be a severe problem, seeing we have no idea what it would be like.


A woman is still needed, an egg is taken from a woman and a sperm sample from a man. They are then merged in a lab and placed inside the man
ImageImage

User avatar
shaoness
Casual Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:01 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: essex, uk

Post by shaoness »

was going to say this can not be possible because there would be no where for the baby to grow as men do not have the necessary parts in order for the baby to grow sorry guys but its true us women rule when it comes to babies.

Sylhana
Veteran Member
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:05 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Babel

Post by Sylhana »

Necrobat wrote:Food for thought for some people if this were real.

We know that each parent donates one gene that determines a child's sex, with XX being for woman and XY being for men.

So what would happen if the child was YY? o.O If males could get pregnant to another male, this would be a severe problem, seeing we have no idea what it would be like.


YY isnt compatible with life (assuming if we artificially synthesize it). Theres alot of genes on X that Y doesnt have, that we need in order to function normally.

Hmph, nobody suggested that males couldnt receive a uterus transplant ;). Of course the immunosuppressant (antirejection) drugs would compromise the pregnancy, also other complications such as hormonal interactions/feedback that would interfere with normal uteral maintenance.

Our genetic engineering tech is nowhere near in making a genetically similar, nonimmunorejectable uterus for a "male" hybrid should I say, as there has to be some major physiological overhaul to allow these organs to coexist in the same individual (hermaphrodites are different, and usually sterile). Lolz, this is just me ranting sci-fi stuff.
<<banned from SRF for bot support. -SG>>

User avatar
XemnasXD
Chronicle Writer
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: US - Illidan

Post by XemnasXD »

Sylhana wrote:
Necrobat wrote:Food for thought for some people if this were real.

We know that each parent donates one gene that determines a child's sex, with XX being for woman and XY being for men.

So what would happen if the child was YY? o.O If males could get pregnant to another male, this would be a severe problem, seeing we have no idea what it would be like.


YY isnt compatible with life (assuming if we artificially synthesize it). Theres alot of genes on X that Y doesnt have, that we need in order to function normally.

Hmph, nobody suggested that males couldnt receive a uterus transplant ;). Of course the immunosuppressant (antirejection) drugs would compromise the pregnancy, also other complications such as hormonal interactions/feedback that would interfere with normal uteral maintenance.

Our genetic engineering tech is nowhere near in making a genetically similar, nonimmunorejectable uterus for a "male" hybrid should I say, as there has to be some major physiological overhaul to allow these organs to coexist in the same individual (hermaphrodites are different, and usually sterile). Lolz, this is just me ranting sci-fi stuff.


Juding by what you said it would be easier to just take the eggs and raise it in a tube rather than transplant it into a male...and your probably right.
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~

User avatar
MrFudge
Elite Member
Posts: 5731
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: None

Post by MrFudge »

XemnasXD wrote:
Sylhana wrote:
Necrobat wrote:Food for thought for some people if this were real.

We know that each parent donates one gene that determines a child's sex, with XX being for woman and XY being for men.

So what would happen if the child was YY? o.O If males could get pregnant to another male, this would be a severe problem, seeing we have no idea what it would be like.


YY isnt compatible with life (assuming if we artificially synthesize it). Theres alot of genes on X that Y doesnt have, that we need in order to function normally.

Hmph, nobody suggested that males couldnt receive a uterus transplant ;). Of course the immunosuppressant (antirejection) drugs would compromise the pregnancy, also other complications such as hormonal interactions/feedback that would interfere with normal uteral maintenance.

Our genetic engineering tech is nowhere near in making a genetically similar, nonimmunorejectable uterus for a "male" hybrid should I say, as there has to be some major physiological overhaul to allow these organs to coexist in the same individual (hermaphrodites are different, and usually sterile). Lolz, this is just me ranting sci-fi stuff.


Juding by what you said it would be easier to just take the eggs and raise it in a tube rather than transplant it into a male...and your probably right.




...tube as in...penis? :P :P :P
now theres a concept :twisted:

*edit*
just thought about that..ouch :(
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Lounge”