U.S. Anti-Doping Agency chief executive Travis Tygart says the agency will ban Lance Armstrong from cycling for life and strip him of his seven Tour de France titles for doping. Armstrong on Thursday night dropped any further challenges to USADA's allegations that he took performance-enhancing drugs to win cycling's premier event from 1999-2005. Armstrong says USADA doesn't have the authority to vacate his Tour titles. However, Tygart told The Associated Press that USADA can do it. Tygart called the Armstrong case a "heartbreaking" example of a win-at-all costs approach to sports.
doping 7 up, 3 down a method of cheating in sports involving blood.
recently, tour de france superpower lance armstrong was accused of doping.
armstrong had allegedly recruited someone to monitor the temperature of his doping blood for him, while he was away on a training trip.
doping describes the instance where blood is removed from an athlete a long time prior to their game/match, then right before the game, after the body has produced replacement blood, the initial blood is reinserted into the body to result in stronger performance. lance armstrong will have to face his doping battle once again in real life, because he's either superman, or he's doping.
I hope I wasn't the only one that didn't know wtf doping was
i dont blame him... just give up trying lance, uve been the most successful cyclist and battled cancer, the least you can expect is some sort of time off but no, not even after you retired can you sit down and relax!
its not like it even matters anymore... the 7 tour de france runners up are not going to be happy they will be claimed winners because this guy got removed for not taking more and more and more tests way after the event.
"guilty until proven innocent" Eh? Well, regardless of whether "Lance Armstrong" is innocent or guilty of doping his name and reputation will be forever tainted. Isn't that so?
Passed over 500 blood tests, still gets banned for doping. The credibility of the USADA witnesses is fairly suspect given that every single one of them has admitted to doping. They could just be jealous of Lance's dominance of the sport so they're trying to bring him down.
On the other hand Lance Armstrong could be a blood doping mastermind that managed to fool every blood test that he had to take in his entire professional career.
Blindfire wrote:On the other hand Lance Armstrong could be a blood doping mastermind that managed to fool every blood test that he had to take in his entire professional career.
That's about what some American journalist said about Bolt.
^doping doesnt even make sense for Bolt, hes not a endurance athelete and he doesnt looked jack on steroids.
So as far as i see, he has been fighting allegations of dooping, and because he dropped them, now hes fcked? how do you prove/disprove something involving doping..? other than blood tests, cause apparently they dont give a fk about that
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO
Let her suck my pistol She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Crumpets for Pres
