Ongoing evidence about ghosts

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:18 am

the mods are playing game

Anyway, I didn't know you hate the paranormal so much :soosad:

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:21 am

I was actually going to post some evidence i have myself about this. Then i read everyones comments and the warning, and was saddened

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:26 am

Key-J wrote:I was actually going to post some evidence i have myself about this. Then i read everyones comments and the warning, and was saddened

Hey, glad ur at my side

if ur not kidding :?:

Fuck the skeptics, they are narrow minded

You can send me your evidence through pm if you want. Then I'll sacrifice to get banned to post it for you

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

I don't see why it's a bannable offense. I assume (since i have yet to read the links) that your merely posting an Article or two of people that believe they have evidence of Paranormal sightings. Some people do find that interesting, just like if you were to post about UFO's or what not, im sure some people on the forums would enjoy the read.

But yeah ill throw you a PM of the 2 photos that we took.

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:31 pm

If this were his first topic on this stuff, nobody would care too much. However, NS makes topic after topic on various trash like this, each one becoming a massive trollfest, everyone has pretty much had enough.

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:34 pm

Like Key-J said I don't think this deserved a warning. He stated his sources, it was the first few members that messed up his topic.

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:40 pm

Those two sources look as legit as tabloids.

Draquish · Post by **Draquish** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:46 pm

Free Silo!!

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:52 pm

MrJoey wrote:Those two sources look as legit as tabloids.

Yes but they are still sources

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:09 pm

MrJoey wrote:Those two sources look as legit as tabloids.

Because it's not a problem about the source. Your respond would be the same even if the article is from BBC, discovery or any famous newspaper

You only like stuffs about natural science, that's all. Sorry, I understand you too much :sohappy:

Remember that paranormal science is a part of life, and it is discussed widely all over the world. If it's allowed on public newspaper, I don't see why it's an offense to post here. :dope:

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:13 pm

If it was posted by: BBC, Discovery, or any other legit source that actually does decent research and backs it up with evidence, then I'd show some interest. When small sources that probably only cater to nutjobs like you post something, I'm going to dismiss it as easily as I will the fact that you seem to think you know me in any way.

BloodyBlade · Post by **BloodyBlade** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:21 pm

Tu tu tu tu tu tu dum. Tu tutu tutu tu dum dum.
GHOSTBUSTERS!

Love · Post by **Love** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:23 pm

If you are not interested in the thread move the ..... on, I'll leave it at that ... can't insult people ...

John_Doe · Post by **John_Doe** » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:39 pm

Silkroad Online Forums

Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts

Re: Ongoing evidence about ghosts