its got ewan in it and he's a hottie....but i can basically figure out the plot from the previews unless there is so super non-cliche twist im missing....but i don't think the author of these books is good enough for that. My friend described the Divinci Code is one of the most pretentious things she's ever read...and she reads alot....
signatures by Hostage Co. <3 ~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
XemnasXD wrote:its got ewan in it and he's a hottie....but i can basically figure out the plot from the previews unless there is so super non-cliche twist im missing....but i don't think the author of these books is good enough for that. My friend described the Divinci Code is one of the most pretentious things she's ever read...and she reads alot....
lol! Yea I read both, Dan Brown seesm like he's great at weaving a story (although impossibly complex, still entertaining if you throw reality out the window), but he should really have had a ghostwriter or collaborated with someone. His writing is pretty terrible. Sentence structure, word choice, vocabulary - at parts it sounded like I was reading a story a high school kid wrote. If he used the word conflagration on more time I was going to puke.
The movie is wayyyyyyyyyyyyy better than the da vinci's code. It looked like it wasnt a disorder of ideas and the movie was well related, it wasnt plain and simple unlike the "first" movie.
There were a couple of parts that i disagreed, cuz i read the book, but meh they werent that relevant at the end.
In general, good movie and i didnt feel dissapointed like i did when i read and then watched the da vinci's code.
I just returned from movie theatre. I was disappointed since I really liked the book a lot. Movie was good as a movie but obviously it can't be compared to book.
I never actually read any of the books but i went to see it yesterday and it was entertaining. I would recommend it.
Want to play Jade Dynasty and get a bunch of free stuff? In USA-East, The Billows My Inductor ID is 8390004X080400090002522Z0d21fe Copy that code and paste it in the box when you make a new character.
Ok so I just saw it and I thought it was pretty bad. The music was the worst of all, for me music can make or break scenes and movies and the music here was just balls. It was expected that it would differ from the book, but I just felt so much was lost, too much actually. A lot of the tension and other stuff just wasn't there. When they go to the Vatican Library he finds the watermark in a second (took longer in the book obviously) and you just don't feel the pressure that they're trying to save the Vatican from total annihilation. Books are obviously different but I just didn't connect with the story here. Things went to fast, the murder of the 4 cardinals was over in like 30 minutes or something. The following of the Path of Illumination was made so easy in the movie. They just fly from location to location. The path was a challenge for the most intelligent scientists of the world at the time, but np for Tom Hanks cause he finds everything in a matter of seconds. The role of the Hassassin was just the one of an ordinary hitman. There was no epic battle between Robert Langdon and the Hassassin in the fountain, nor did Robert parachute out of the helicopter with a windshield into the tiber. That's stuff Chuck Norris would die to do, but it's left out here?
Also could be my local cinema, but the music was actually making conversations hard to follow. (I didn't wear my contacts so I couldn't read subtitles, not that I usually do but it did bring the problem to my attention)
i enjoyed it, even after reading the book.. if the director could make a 12h+ movie then you would probably get what you want, but shrinking it all on a 3h- film would be very hard. of course some parts that seemed to take forever in the book would be faster in the film, but it was all there. good movie. and tom hanks ftw
>>