Page 1 of 1

Gamer

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:05 pm
by aazumak
for SOTW

Image

yea, still trying new stuff out


edit:
Image

as for the grass being slanted, i tipped the whole sig, and extended the sky by hand, the render didnt fit my sig size

Re: Gamer

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:12 pm
by HOLLAstir
Looks LQ. Overall it needs more depth. Balance out the tones better. The kid on the grass looks weird to me. The grass cuts off and slops, yet the kid stays the same. Just doesn't look right. I like that you're trying out different styles, as i'm doing the same.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:44 am
by HavinFunSince89
For me I say that the effect of the laptop doesn't look good cuz it look like it's busted.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:10 pm
by rek
Not really liking this one, because the effekts around him look fsfsdf..


The outline of the boy looks like you cut him out with a soft brush.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:16 pm
by BrokenSaint
At least he's stepping out of his usual style and I'm liking it. Try experimenting more with this. Anywho, the colors are awesome. Nice text placement too. I'd pick a different stock though lol :P

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:36 pm
by Waisha
The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

:P

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:44 pm
by Hostage
Waisha wrote:The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

:P

Thank you.

It seems like people are just looking for something to bitch about the sig. I get it " ...in a GFX forum they're more harsh...they're this...they're that" blah blah fikkity blah. You know what though I remember when people used to get referred to SRF AC because we're not like other GFX sites. We tell you what you need to know to improve without all the bitchy-ness ( yes that's a word =P).

Now I'm not saying be all lovey touchy feely just don't bash the sig like it's shit right off the bat.

Anyway, I don't see a problem with the quality of the pic. Just seem's a bit empty to me and I do agree with HOLLA on the slope. It seems a bit odd.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:11 pm
by HOLLAstir
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:30 pm
by Waisha
HOLLAstir wrote:It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ? :P

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:33 pm
by HOLLAstir
Waisha wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ? :P

Well they either choose LQ stocks, or the effects they do to it, makes it appear LQ. Forgot to add the last part.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:36 pm
by deep.in
What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it :x :x :x :x :x :x mad, i'm mad :x


Nice sig btw :) :D

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:44 pm
by deep.in
Hershey wrote:
deep.in wrote:What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it :x :x :x :x :x :x mad, i'm mad :x


Nice sig btw :) :D


The new theme for the new week is Video Games.


But,but but but where is topic? i cant find it :( And thx :) :love:

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:49 pm
by Hostage
HOLLAstir wrote:It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.


"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:51 pm
by deep.in
Oh my :oops: i tought Sig Wars is 1vs1 :oops: Sorry :oops:

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:52 pm
by aazumak
yes, my stock is average size, kinda small, but not horrible quality, but my sharpen effect on lighten made it look LQ

i realize it now, but it seemed good at first

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:05 pm
by Waisha
I also think the LQ look could be beacause of the blue effect interfering with the edges of the stock. I like the sig alot though. Awesome flow.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:24 pm
by HOLLAstir
Hostage wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.


"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.

I only say "harsh" because thats how people here take it.

Re: Gamer

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:06 pm
by YangKang
lol, imo it looks like you made his smile go from :) to "WTF WHY ISNT THIS WORKING!????"