
Im pretty happy with it, the only thing I dislike is the text >_<
Faiien wrote:text is bad, you need more effects, more work needs to be done to the original stock



Iam not gonna talk circles around someone and tell them what they need to improve on in a paragraph. I would rather just point out what they need to work on in bullet points. Which usually means that my critique is very short and to the point, no sugar coating. When theres something good about the sig, ill say it but ive seen the original stock for that sig and he hasnt done much on it and i dont really like anything else he's done on it so what should i say 12:11? should i make up nice little comments that are completely fake and lie to him? nah, id rather not, if the sig isnt done very well iam not afraid to say so. Iam not gonna sit there and tell him things that i dont think are very important.TwelveEleven wrote:Can't you ever post positive constructive feedback? Lately I've only seen really negative feedback from you..
Faiien wrote:Iam not gonna talk circles around someone and tell them what they need to improve on in a paragraph. I would rather just point out what they need to work on in bullet points. Which usually means that my critique is very short and to the point, no sugar coating. When theres something good about the sig, ill say it but ive seen the original stock for that sig and he hasnt done much on it and i dont really like anything else he's done on it so what should i say 12:11? should i make up nice little comments that are completely fake and lie to him? nah, id rather not, if the sig isnt done very well iam not afraid to say so. Iam not gonna sit there and tell him things that i dont think are very important.TwelveEleven wrote:Can't you ever post positive constructive feedback? Lately I've only seen really negative feedback from you..
When i was first critiqued on my sigs Holla didnt resist to hold back on me either. And ya i whined the first couple of times then i got used to it and I appreciate that he didnt sugar coat his critiques on my sig either or else i would have never known what I needed to work on. If people dont like the way i critique then they can tell me so and I wont critique their work anymore. But i dont feel it is in your responsibility to tell me what i should and shouldnt write.
/rant
BrokenSaint wrote:Well one thing to constructive criticsm is that you at least give them tips as to how they can improve their work instead of just pointing out flaws only. I think that's what 1211 is trying to get at.
12:11 wrote:I was talking about you in general, not about in that one topic. You've only been posting negative comments lately, that doesn't give you a good position as an artist that's "above" another. If someone keeps on making bad sigs and doesn't react to good positive constructive feedback then I see no reason to hold back, but you've just been posting comments existing of 2 lines with some critiques on a sig. This doesn't make people like you, you might
not be on here for that. But I've seen people going your way more than you might think and 'the path of destruction' isn't a fun one to walk on. If you can start making constructive posts that would be nice. (In general) if you see no reason to do this on 1 sig, that would be fine, but last 2 days I've only seen those 'not so nice' ones..
This was meant in general from the beginning, we all start off as noobs. So did you. Don't give others too much bad critique because that will hold a lot of people from ever continuing there work thinking this is how we artists are.. I just wanted to point out that we're not. And if you're going to a bad phase we've all been there, we can help you. Just ask. Don't go too far (you haven't yet, just warning you.) there have been several people going your way before you. That's why I wanted to notify you of that. I hope that from this point on you will start to make some positive constructive critique actually helping improve the sig rather than destroying the little feelings people had for becoming an artist.
Yours truly,
1211
Ps. that was what I meant BS
Faiien wrote:I quit this convo
Iam too tired to deal with this crap
once again, its my critique and the posters of the original sig have said nothing about it
if they feel it is offensive then they can tell me that themselves
i see no reason why you have to interfere
when I see that the original poster of the sig has actually put in some actual effort then i will actually put in some effort on the critique
its a 2 way street. if they feel like making a sig by slapping things together of course iam not gonna waste my time and point out all the flaws in the sig
iam not breaking any rules
and iam not heading down any paths of "destruction"

12:11 wrote:I just explained several things and then you just say you don't see a reason for me to interfere with your critiques, you also say you don't see a reason to put in effort in you critiques when the maker of the sig didn't put any effort in the sig, o please do tell me how you know someone didn't put a lot of effort in something you find crappy?
If people dont want me to post critiques on their sigs then I will be happy to comply. Just tell me and you wont hear another word out of me on one of your works. And i dont understand how this would hurt me?12:11 wrote:If you're not gonna waste your time pointing out the flaws, maybe just maybe you should consider not posting your critiques at all. It's a 2 way street after all, if you start hurting people with your critiques then you end up getting hurt yourself.
12:11 wrote:Who said anything about rules? You don't have to be a rulebreaker to be an ahole to others.. So far you haven't gone down the path of "destruction" but I can 'feel' you going that way.. if you were to post on gfx sites like that you wouldn't last long..
12:11 wrote:btw i tried taking it to pm but i guess you didn't want that..
YangKang wrote:Faiien your critisim was rude IMO

