Silkroad Online Forums

Got bored and decided to play around in pshop a bit. Won't use it.




EDIT: here's a .gif version for IE posers.

dom wrote:Got bored and decided to play around in pshop a bit. Won't use it.




EDIT: here's a .gif version for IE posers.

I like it.. mostly because I love silly hats but I like it

Why do you give a stuff about IE users? If they can't get a real browser why the hell should we format images for them? :/

Wa? I'm confused, they both look the same to me and I use IE.

sorry 56k, was speaking about those that are update-challenged.

GelGooG wrote:Why do you give a stuff about IE users? If they can't get a real browser why the hell should we format images for them? :/

That is a pretty selfish thing to say. Just becuase YOU arnt using IE doesnt mean that others arnt. Even though I personally do not perfer IE some people do and you have no right to be treating people like that.

BTW I love your sig, even though you arnt going to use it. I am sorta happy you arnt going to use it because it is a little large for my liking, but good non-the-less. That 4th degree hat looks like a pot leaf with too many leaves. The female model is a pot leaf though, its really funny.

Actually, when you consider what a huge security risk IE is in general, it's pretty selfless to deny yourself exposure to a great number of potential admirers in order to lead them to a better browser.

I just thought I would post a responce.

At home I exclusively use Firefox and 98% of the time do not use IE. However at my workplace I have no choice but IE as all of my applications are IE based.

So stating that IE users are idiots makes you an idiot in my book.

Tatianasaphira wrote:So stating that IE users are idiots makes you an idiot in my book.

Who said that?

This is what has been said:

GelGooG wrote:Why do you give a stuff about IE users? If they can't get a real browser why the hell should we format images for them? :/

and

Dom wrote:EDIT: here's a .gif version for IE posers.

Quite personally, I also think IE users should stop whining about it.
I mean... there IS an IE version that supports PNG, Internet Explorer 7!

yeah but my stupid IT department wont download it...sniffle...I want my Mozilla at work

ya didnt have ta make the IE one a .gif. unles this forums got diff skins, use the same colour as the bg. that way u save quality by using a .png. stil loks transparetn. i remember when i used ta make sigs..ahhthe good old days lol.

N00ber_B00ber wrote:ya didnt have ta make the IE one a .gif. unles this forums got diff skins, use the same colour as the bg. that way u save quality by using a .png. stil loks transparetn. i remember when i used ta make sigs..ahhthe good old days lol.

If you didn't notice, the background colour of each post alternates from white to lightgray.

lol didnt notice that. thx fer the heads up. lol im quite the noob here. about ths sig, if ya blur the bg near the guy it would make it look a little more pop out-ish IF ur going for the look. rightn ow it looks pretty much flat. wtf is the bg, cuz i like it. the colours are also quite nice, the flow nicely. now if only it was possible to get better render quality

Dom on question: how do you get your sig "camouflaged" to the background?

Transparency? When you export the file save it under gif or png, make sure transparency is checked.

TY! Btw, I like the sigs you made above *request, request*.

Super necro xD
*bump*

lol

LOL.
Punch out remix.

All of this just keeps getting better and better.

What's next?
SuperDominic van Ha. Saving the Silkroad one by one.

We love you dom.

You guys are seeing things.

Haha fena.

The other one sucks more.

lol...

in dom's post the images don't show, then the second guy quotes them and I can see them loud and clearly >.<

And they're fugly.

Srsly... and the other guy.. 56K or something, is blind. The second one is obviosely lighter.

But.. 1/10. Even MY sigs were better then that.

Icealya wrote:lol...

in dom's post the images don't show, then the second guy quotes them and I can see them loud and clearly >.<

And they're fugly.

Srsly... and the other guy.. 56K or something, is blind. The second one is obviosely lighter.

But.. 1/10. Even MY sigs were better then that.

lol, I don't think dom's sigs are bad. It's just what he wrote.

Punch Out Remix, yah hah.

fena wrote:

Icealya wrote:lol...

in dom's post the images don't show, then the second guy quotes them and I can see them loud and clearly >.<

And they're fugly.

Srsly... and the other guy.. 56K or something, is blind. The second one is obviosely lighter.

But.. 1/10. Even MY sigs were better then that.

lol, I don't think dom's sigs are bad. It's just what he wrote.

Punch Out Remix, yah hah.

Is that your final answer?

REMIX!

epic necro. ^^

omg check out my thread I make new sigs I want you to comment. u_u

Nothing fucking epic about it.

Priam wrote:Nothing fucking epic about it.

Everything that has to do with dom and signature making is epic.

0l3n wrote:

Priam wrote:Nothing fucking epic about it.

Everything that has to do with dom and signature making is epic.

Pointless resses of threads being pro-claimed 'epic' has nothing to do with Dom and sigs, therefor making it utterly rediculous.