NSR~ Will Smith (Rizla please comment mine xD)

HavinFunSince89 · Post by **HavinFunSince89** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:14 pm

pls rate my new sig and I gethered and used all your comments and used it on this so this took me a lot of time to do.

If you want to give comments again its ok It'll help me a lot and thanks for the criticism hehe

P.S.> Rizla I especially followed your long criticism from my last sig and used it here

thanks tho for showing my mistakes.

cin · Post by **cin** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:28 pm

just the lightsource that looks a little odd imo. i like the effect left of his
head, n the txt is pretty good (could be moved up a bit imo).

lighting is a bit weird.. not the right direction.. n not the right color (too white)

7.5/10

edit: o n imo it also looks a little empty on the left n right of his head

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:08 pm

i really like Will Smith but you got him looking kinda old lol!

otherwise its nice

7/10

Snudge · Post by **Snudge** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:26 pm

Focal point looks LQ, and it's a floating head... Gief neck.

And, to me, the light on the focal should be coming from the left, but that could be just me.

TwelveEleven · Post by **TwelveEleven** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:13 pm

Luoma wrote:i really like Will Smith but you got him looking kinda old lol!

otherwise its nice 7/10

Rizla · Post by **Rizla** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:16 pm

sharpen/find a better render, needs some work on blending between your two main bg colors, but dont overdo it subtlety is key because the bg is just a support structure, not a highlight. Text looks good in structure but seems pixelated a bit.

Guys guys guys...you do realize you dont HAVE to see the lightsource in a picture? This could be accurate (thought slightly awkward looking, perhaps tone it down a bit) if he is portraying the light hitting wills face washing out the surface of the "wall" (bg) behind him.

++floating head.

Post by **dom** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:27 pm

cin wrote:just the lightsource that looks a little odd imo

XD

HavinFunSince89 · Post by **HavinFunSince89** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:02 am

ok thanks for your comments and so next time I'll know what to fix and btw he has a neck it just in the stuck its quite hiddent and cant really be seen that why I lieft a space in the btm oh well thanks anyway

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:09 am

OMG use periods pl0x!

HavinFunSince89 · Post by **HavinFunSince89** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:20 am

hmkay

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:23 pm

BrokenSaint wrote:OMG use periods pl0x!

Stop saying pl0x, pl0x!

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:38 pm

0l3n wrote:
BrokenSaint wrote:OMG use periods pl0x!

Stop saying pl0x, pl0x!

But... but...

pl0xz lol

Rizla · Post by **Rizla** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:24 pm

0l3n wrote:
BrokenSaint wrote:OMG use periods pl0x!

Stop saying pl0x, please.

No really, pl0x is not a logical abbreviation of the word please, it even requires more keystrokes in a conficguration that requires more movement over a keyboard. On a microscale it conveys to me that the person using it is retarded, as not only is it illogical -- most people dont get it, therefore you may have to elaborate on your intended message, causing extra time wasted on such a simple thing as please, or pls.

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:57 pm

Rizla wrote:Stop saying pl0x, please.

No really, pl0x is not a logical abbreviation of the word please, it even requires more keystrokes in a conficguration that requires more movement over a keyboard. On a microscale it conveys to me that the person using it is retarded, as not only is it illogical -- most people dont get it, therefore you may have to elaborate on your intended message, causing extra time wasted on such a simple thing as please, or pls.[/quote]

What a random and interesting post O.o

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:59 pm

HavinFunSince89 · Post by **HavinFunSince89** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 12:55 pm

ya just give a simple pls hehe