Silkroad Online Forums

http://www.the-revolutionaries.com ... still incomplete but the structure is there.

CS:S is nub.
Get 1.6. If you actually played both, you'd take 1.6.
1.6 is OK gfx, CS:S is just for the graphics.
steam = Antigravity
and btw, isn't this in the wrong topic, lol?

pherball wrote:CS:S is nub.
Get 1.6.

+1 i <3 1.6

about that site part, doesnt he mean the gfx on it?

maybe but shouldn't he say that? lol

pherball is right, i have all 4

1.5
1.6
cz
css

The worst out of all four would be cz, then 1.5 css the cs1.6

css only wins in gfx, physics and HDR, (high definition range, same phizix from hl2, thats why its great) but play it and it dont feel fun the normal cs, iunno cs1.6 is really fun and challenging, css is Farking messed up the recoil is horrible its incredibly low, me and my friends ran acouple physics test, range and recoil/shooting test, its easy as **** to get headshots in that game (especially with a famas on burst) all you have to get in cal is spary'n'pray, no skill required, plus theres aloota glitches with the phizix thou, valve are idiots, they should of just used the same hitboxes they used for cs1.6, but maybe made the left leg a LITTLE bit smaller...

1.6 is just too old.
Great game, but dying out.

I find CS:S easier.

And the webpage looks cool but might look better with a backround picture, I dont no.

css IS easier its not just you, the head area of the hitbox is bigger plus, theres some delay with the hitbox as it moves its slower than it seems, just a tad thou, thats why its super easy to get headshots with a moving target


SURF & ZM FTW

Nice site dom, simple, stylish, effective.. I'll probably pop in the pub sometime.

It's a lot blacker than it was in earlier versions. Needs more color.

I agree with Bake!

And btw, when we look at website, we know instantly it is you the maker lol