Page 1 of 1

HEY HEY HEY CRIMSON

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:29 am
by rek

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:56 am
by naljamees51
erm....this is one really nice font :roll:
did crim needed it?

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:08 am
by rek
she asked for it in rate the sig above urs topic

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:22 am
by naljamees51
aa ok ^^




btw ... crim is SHE? i didn't knew it ^^
well honor to her :D

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:37 am
by rek
i dont really know..its just a reflex i type "she" IF UR A GUY MY BAD

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:21 pm
by Sol
reK wrote:MY BAD


^^ i lol'd

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:18 pm
by Geedunk
Guys.. Advanced text like that (mainly calligraphic) is just.. Too much.. Simple text > advanced text.

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:51 pm
by hitokiri
Well it depends on the type of signature. Sometimes a pixel font or simple one is better, sometimes one of these can work. but it definitely depends on what you put it on.

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:55 pm
by CrimsonNuker
Im A Guy. =_=

Yay! thnx!

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:04 pm
by Geedunk
HTVHitokiri wrote:Well it depends on the type of signature. Sometimes a pixel font or simple one is better, sometimes one of these can work. but it definitely depends on what you put it on.


You're wrong. Advanced text doesn't fit in any SIGNATURE.

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:08 pm
by CrimsonNuker
Geedunk wrote:
HTVHitokiri wrote:Well it depends on the type of signature. Sometimes a pixel font or simple one is better, sometimes one of these can work. but it definitely depends on what you put it on.


You're wrong. Advanced text doesn't fit in any SIGNATURE.


......you're insane, the text is a crucial part in a sig, i mean like you dont see a really good good good good goood gooooooood sig (maybe something with robots or something techy) and the text is new times roman and think woah awsome the text is amazing, it goes really well with the sig!

No. Try pixel fonts.

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:52 pm
by Geedunk
CrimsonNuker wrote:
Geedunk wrote:
HTVHitokiri wrote:Well it depends on the type of signature. Sometimes a pixel font or simple one is better, sometimes one of these can work. but it definitely depends on what you put it on.


You're wrong. Advanced text doesn't fit in any SIGNATURE.


......you're insane, the text is a crucial part in a sig, i mean like you dont see a really good good good good goood gooooooood sig (maybe something with robots or something techy) and the text is new times roman and think woah awsome the text is amazing, it goes really well with the sig!

No. Try pixel fonts.


Erm, dude, you just hit yourself in the head..

You're encouraging people to use advanced text, yet you also encourage them to use PIXEL fonts - Do you know what pixel fonts are? - The frigging most simple font on the planet. GOD Farking DAMNIT!

- Most pro people doesn't even add text, because it usually **** it up.

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:01 pm
by CrimsonNuker
Geedunk wrote:
CrimsonNuker wrote:
Geedunk wrote:
HTVHitokiri wrote:Well it depends on the type of signature. Sometimes a pixel font or simple one is better, sometimes one of these can work. but it definitely depends on what you put it on.


You're wrong. Advanced text doesn't fit in any SIGNATURE.


......you're insane, the text is a crucial part in a sig, i mean like you dont see a really good good good good goood gooooooood sig (maybe something with robots or something techy) and the text is new times roman and think woah awsome the text is amazing, it goes really well with the sig!

No. Try pixel fonts.


Erm, dude, you just hit yourself in the head..

You're encouraging people to use advanced text, yet you also encourage them to use PIXEL fonts - Do you know what pixel fonts are? - The frigging most simple font on the planet. GOD Farking DAMNIT!

- Most pro people doesn't even add text, because it usually **** it up.


:banghead: as in advanced text, i thought u meant non-defult text >>.<<

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:05 pm
by Geedunk