V1.
V2.

CrimsonNuker wrote:Geedunk wrote:Cap, if you haven't got anything to say but "b/w sigs sucks ass" or so, then **** off. Your sig could get pwnd by any Farking black background with white text on it.
Ouch.
Im glad i didnt say anything about b/w sigs
Geedunk wrote:CrimsonNuker wrote:Geedunk wrote:Cap, if you haven't got anything to say but "b/w sigs sucks ass" or so, then **** off. Your sig could get pwnd by any Farking black background with white text on it.
Ouch.
Im glad i didnt say anything about b/w sigs
1) I'm saying my opinion
2) So is he, but his opinion isn't a fact. Mine was.
3) Your retro sig kicks ass, even though you pretty much didn't do shit :P.
4) B/W does pwn, if you can handle it. A pro B/W can pwn ANY colored sig. The depth in B/W is sexy,



Geedunk wrote:Cap, if you haven't got anything to say but "b/w sigs sucks ass" or so, then **** off. Your sig could get pwnd by any Farking black background with white text on it.
0l3n wrote:If you dont like b/w sigs at all than dont post!
0l3n wrote:ElCapuccino wrote:and b/w is bad!
Thats just the thing that I dont want to hear.
ElCapuccino wrote:0l3n wrote:ElCapuccino wrote:and b/w is bad!
Thats just the thing that I dont want to hear.
you ask for opinions...and i give u mine.
ElCapuccino wrote:If you dont like b/w sigs at all than dont post
he didn't posted that at the top, so i couldn't see that.
Sorry if I broke you heart.
And if someone says:orComent...that means that person asks for opinions.Rate please.