Silkroad Online Forums

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:41 pm**

Some are old, some are kinda new.

Rate it, give CONSTRUCTIVE critism

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:59 pm**

b/w style= teh uglyness

cc= dont use it

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:01 pm**

i really don't like b/w.
I think one of the important things in a sig is colour...
sorry.

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:10 pm**

I love black & white. Much harder to work with. I remember my old photography days.

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:01 pm**

CrimsonNuker wrote:b/w style= teh uglyness

cc= dont use it

Somebody doesnt know constructive criticism :roll:

_______________
Anyhow. For the first, if you had more of the teal brushing in it, to balance it more it would be good. The lighting on it is very nice though.

Second again the lighting is good, but not feeling that shade of red. something that would look cool is to have maybe her lips be red with a different shade. Think that may look cool.

Third I like it, would say if you had the word black in white color, it would be better. But the lighting and everything else is really nice

Fourth just seems a little too dark for me to make out exactly whats going on in it. However if you tried giving it that effect to go with the suffocation text, then nice job lol.

All nicely done. Im used to seeing very impacting colors and lighting effects from your signatures, so its interesting to see them in black and white.

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:49 pm**

I

b/w. Try using ink or adjustment layers to bring out more depth. Also, play around w/ placement of effects + lighting.

Posted: **Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:45 pm**

HTVHitokiri wrote:
CrimsonNuker wrote:b/w style= teh uglyness

cc= dont use it

Somebody doesnt know constructive criticism
_______________
Anyhow. For the first, if you had more of the teal brushing in it, to balance it more it would be good. The lighting on it is very nice though.

Second again the lighting is good, but not feeling that shade of red. something that would look cool is to have maybe her lips be red with a different shade. Think that may look cool.

Third I like it, would say if you had the word black in white color, it would be better. But the lighting and everything else is really nice

Fourth just seems a little too dark for me to make out exactly whats going on in it. However if you tried giving it that effect to go with the suffocation text, then nice job lol.

All nicely done. Im used to seeing very impacting colors and lighting effects from your signatures, so its interesting to see them in black and white.

*sigh* fine

dont use black coloured text in a really black area and dont use white text in a really white area

and...b/w not ftw

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:29 am**

they all look 10/10 to me but they kinda look the same

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:38 am**

i like b/w ...
but im not gnna try to do these myself ^^ because i know it not gnna work out :roll:

these sigs what have you made are nice... but the 2nt sig's 'g' looks a little weird

mostly i like the 3rd sig but that sig text... nah ^^'

anyway... nice sigs keep up the good work :wink:

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:04 pm**

hellsharpt wrote:I love black & white. Much harder to work with. I remember my old photography days.

Are you THAT old?

taking b/w photographs..that was in... 1900 ish

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:19 pm**

Geedunk wrote:
Some are old, some are kinda new.

Rate it, give CONSTRUCTIVE critism

Question do you always use stock for images of real people? Or do your prefer a render.. ?

Oh I like it but the text kinda lacks, try adding some sort of low opacity glow. >.>

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:23 pm**

-)G(-Kratos wrote:
hellsharpt wrote:I love black & white. Much harder to work with. I remember my old photography days.

Are you THAT old? taking b/w photographs..that was in... 1900 ish

blah blah blah, graduated high school in '87 do the math. Thre was color photography of course, but black and white took more skill (and was cheaper) so that's what we did. As I said I prefer it.

Posted: **Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:11 pm**

Plus44 wrote:
Geedunk wrote:
Some are old, some are kinda new.

Rate it, give CONSTRUCTIVE critism

Question do you always use stock for images of real people? Or do your prefer a render.. ?

Oh I like it but the text kinda lacks, try adding some sort of low opacity glow. >.>

None of those signatures up there were made of renders - all stocks.
Working with stocks are way harder, since you're not "just" adding stuff - you're manipulating the image.

Thank you, everyone, who gave me CONSTRUCTIVE critism.

And for those, who just said "I don't like B/W" or "B/W sucks" - Go **** yourself or make something nice.

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:48 am**

-)G(-Kratos wrote:
hellsharpt wrote:I love black & white. Much harder to work with. I remember my old photography days.

Are you THAT old? taking b/w photographs..that was in... 1900 ish

ehh

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:07 pm**

Geedunk wrote:
Plus44 wrote:
Geedunk wrote:
Some are old, some are kinda new.

Rate it, give CONSTRUCTIVE critism

Question do you always use stock for images of real people? Or do your prefer a render.. ?

Oh I like it but the text kinda lacks, try adding some sort of low opacity glow. >.>

And for those, who just said "I don't like B/W" or "B/W sucks" - Go **** yourself or make something nice.

i'm on it.

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:19 pm**

Your F*****g yourself? :shock:

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:36 pm**

0l3n wrote:Your F*****g yourself?

or make something nice.

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:38 pm**

So I ask again...

0l3n wrote:Your F*****g yourself?

Posted: **Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:33 pm**

0l3n wrote:So I ask again...

0l3n wrote:Your F*****g yourself?

and i say again:

or make something nice.

Silkroad Online Forums

B/W style

B/W style

Re: B/W style

Re: B/W style

Re: B/W style