I was trying to pick some prints to buy for the new apartment when I stumbled onto this guy's work. Just want to share...
Spoiler!
I might get this baby on either:
24"x60"
or
36"x36"
It's going to be placed above the bed so I'm leaning towards 36x36 but it crops out the top part of the piece which is quite annoying since you don't get the same effect. Then again, 24" width might be a bit too short for a bed.
I decided to settle for this instead of hoping for a miracle that Murakami's price might drop by 90% or so since the only stuff I could afford from him were (sorry Superflat fanatics) garbage. The only stuff worth purchasing from Murakami's collection were ranging from $2000-$15,000 for a fucking limited giclee reprint.
Re: Pop Art is Dead?
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:59 am
by Shomari
thats some awesome stuff. And you just reaffirmed the fact that you crap money.
Re: Pop Art is Dead?
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:31 am
by inky
Lol things I buy instead of a car
Re: Pop Art is Dead?
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:11 pm
by *BlackFox
inky wrote:$2000-$15,000 for a Farking limited giclee reprint.
Yeah.. It's a crazy price
Re: Pop Art is Dead?
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:58 pm
by Skyve
When I read the title of the thread, I thought of XenmasXD.
