Page 1 of 1
rek's wall --updated-- 23rd.02 textless for the haters
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 3:24 pm
by rek
Pretty bored these days and i decided to startup Ps again.
This is just the start of something cool
hopefullynot really looking for cnc, more just to show off what i've done. good, bad and the whatever, everything gets posted here.+++++++++++++
6th feb 2.16am
and the original;
Didnt really have any of my stocks or c4ds or the such, what i used in the piece was just somethings i scraped off google images last second. Extremely rusty, o well everyone starts some place.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 6:48 pm
by Kraq
February 6th Piece
Really nice bro.
I particularly like the blue c4d, but the red one bothers me a bit. It seems a bit thrown in, especially the part on the far right.
And add some lighting to the focal, correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you didn't modify the focal at all in regard to the lighting of the piece. Makes it look a bit flat.
Haven't seen the whole "smudged focal" thing in a loooong time, works really well here.
The size also really adds to the quality, which makes it so much better.
Cool piece, looking forward to the rest.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:06 pm
by Skyve
Sweet.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 3:23 am
by MasterKojito
Weew, looking forward to what you produce. I might have to get back into ps.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:16 am
by Shomari
go go go
btw, sharpen much? lol.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 9:41 am
by Priam
Don't like the open ' skin' in the middle part of her body. It's ok on the original but now it just looks weird.
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:33 am
by jaksje
The only thing that i find wierd is like what Priam said above, the cleavage is kind of lower idk, its wierd, the rest like
Re: rek's wall '11
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:56 am
by MasterKojito
More
Re: rek's wall '11 [updated-23rd-02]
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:25 pm
by rek
23//02//11 6.24am
textless
and the original
I think its okay, not amazed with myself but imo its cool. also, i lost a game in LoL and vented it out on Ps.
EDIT: added a textless version for the haters
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:58 pm
by jaksje
im sorry, but i really think this is dissapointing to the first you that you had, the first one was well thought etc. this one seems like you just used a tut for lightening, which you flapped on a random image.
Next up --> making a ps when winning a game of LoL
lol
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:05 pm
by rek
it's a lot more complicated than how you just put it
and lul, I haven't looked at a tut in years
check out all the differences with lighting and so on between my piece and the original and then tell me I just slapped lightning on a random image
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:13 pm
by Majorharper
rek wrote:it's a lot more complicated than how you just put it
and lul, I haven't looked at a tut in years
check out all the differences with lighting and so on between my piece and the original and then tell me I just slapped lightning on a random image
I never comment on people's artwork because I am not a pro nor do I know how hard it is to make these edits, but wow im disappointed with the cyan blue lines next to the lightning strike, seems like I could to that on paint...
What went wrong?
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:20 pm
by rek
Nothing is wrong. I like it that way.
innerthought; wow its offensive when someone tells you your piece is 'wrong'
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:22 pm
by Majorharper
rek wrote:Nothing is wrong. I like it that way.
innerthought; wow its offensive when someone tells you your piece is 'wrong'
It pop's out in too many negative ways, i dont know, I would have sticked too the lightning strike only
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:23 pm
by rek
Master_of_Puppets wrote:rek wrote:Nothing is wrong. I like it that way.
innerthought; wow its offensive when someone tells you your piece is 'wrong'
It pop's out in too many negative ways, i dont know, I would have sticked too the lightning strike only
With just the lightning strike it looks lame and generic
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:25 pm
by Majorharper
rek wrote:Master_of_Puppets wrote:rek wrote:Nothing is wrong. I like it that way.
innerthought; wow its offensive when someone tells you your piece is 'wrong'
It pop's out in too many negative ways, i dont know, I would have sticked too the lightning strike only
With just the lightning strike it looks lame and generic
Sure anyways I give up, I have no say in this anymore, not good enough to say jibberish about ps and what you should have done or not done...
First work was really good btw
Re: rek's wall '11 --updated-- 23rd.02
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:27 pm
by rek
Its cool, anyways i thought the first one was complete shit.
everyone has different taste i guess
Re: rek's wall --updated-- 23rd.02 textless for the haters
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:38 pm
by Skyve
Simple but has a decent result. As Shomari would say "FK TEXT".
Re: rek's wall --updated-- 23rd.02 textless for the haters
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:40 pm
by inky
I like what you did with the colors...it's a dramatic change in the mood and if dark is what you're aiming for, then you really hit the spot. But I'm really not feeling the smudgy-looking (fat) lightning and the random green lines. Also, the lightning covering a relatively huge portion of the bridge is bothering me. If it was my piece and I were to revisit it, I would definitely consider making the width of the lightning slightly more unequal and jagged - especially at the ends. And also lose the random lines. That's just my 2 cents on this one though.
Re: rek's wall --updated-- 23rd.02 textless for the haters
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:08 pm
by rek
Need to get this thread cleaned.
thank you
