Page 1 of 1
[Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:19 am
by Skyve
Render : C.C from Code Geass
I know the font is a bit far but I really wanted the "Geass" to be in Overlay to get the colors from the Space BG.
Comments,Critics,Rate,Suggestions,etc. I'm here to learn

I'm up for a few edits.
Normal

Bordered.

Mini
Could you guys please tell me which version is better. I'm thinking of using this signature for my first BSOTW on a GFX forums.(Beginner's Sig of the Week).
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:37 am
by 0l3n
Id say get rid of the text on all of them.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:08 pm
by Noobs_Slayer
Eighter remove text as 0l3n said, eighter blend it in. Also try to make effects go in 1 direction it will make your sig look cleaner and more pr0. GL with further works.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:25 pm
by Skyve
Screw Fonts then

But does it look better in Mini? Considering there's some empty space.
Some really cool & wise guy wrote:Could you guys please tell me which version is better. I'm thinking of using this signature for my first BSOTW on a GFX forums.(Beginner's Sig of the Week).
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:35 pm
by 0l3n
Id say mini without text.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:10 pm
by Skyve
0l3n wrote:Id say mini without text.
Think I'll get a weaker mark if I don't have text?
EDIT: Screw it, I'll just make another tag for the BSOTW.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:33 pm
by 0l3n
ExSoldier wrote:0l3n wrote:Id say mini without text.
Think I'll get a weaker mark if I don't have text?
EDIT: Screw it, I'll just make another tag for the BSOTW.
Why would you get a weaker mark?
If someone comments you and sais "add text" then they are just bandwagon dipshits who cant think for themselves and have no creative ability what so ever.
Not saying text is wrong, absolutely not, but adding text for the sake of adding text is just stupid.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:37 am
by Hostage
ExSoldier wrote:I really wanted the "Geass" to be in Overlay to get the colors from the Space BG.
Clipping mask + Blending?
Biggest qualm I have is lack of attention to lighting. You have multiple light sources(+ a lens flare?) but none of which match the lighting of the render leaving the tag flat. So I'd say work on that and contrast because, now this could be my monitor settings, it seems overly bright.
Wish I could say more but I haven't worked on such a small canvas in quiet a while so I'll leave it at that before I get ahead of myself.
GL
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:44 am
by Skyve
I did have a hard time, I coudn't use Omni(Render->Lighting) because it would make her glow way too much. So at the end I just used a huge white soft brush for lighting. And the Lens Flare is caused by a brand new set of Star brush I downloaded,my bad

Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:44 am
by Skyve
-- Double Post --
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:12 pm
by 0l3n
Long time no see Hostage, you back?
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:05 pm
by Skyve
0l3n wrote:Long time no see Hostage, you back?
Holy shiat thats Hostage

I though one of you guys had a new signature or something.

Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:34 am
by Kirkaldi
but your not a beginner
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:52 am
by Skyve
Kirkaldi wrote:but your not a beginner
Check some GFX forums, I am a beginner imo

Plus I hate this tag.

Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:56 am
by Kraq
This Aurora sig is Solid-High Beginner, Halibel is a Solid Novice.
IMO, you are still a "Beginner," in terms of experience.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:07 am
by Skyve
Kraq wrote:This Aurora sig is Solid-High Beginner, Halibel is a Solid Novice.
IMO, you are still a "Beginner," in terms of experience.
I personally think Halibel is better than Aurora

Then again I don't quite understand your ranking system xD
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:28 am
by Kraq
ExSoldier wrote:Kraq wrote:This Aurora sig is Solid-High Beginner, Halibel is a Solid Novice.
IMO, you are still a "Beginner," in terms of experience.
I personally think Halibel is better than Aurora

Then again I don't quite understand your ranking system xD
Beginner->Novice->Moderate->Intermediate->Semi Pro->Pro
And all the in-betweens;Low->Solid->High.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:45 am
by Skyve
Let's all adopt Kraq's system for CnC

Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:38 pm
by Scarth
That isn't Kraq's system, it's the GFX world's system in general.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:53 pm
by Kraq
Yers, it's the universal classing system.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:08 am
by Skyve
Scarth wrote:That isn't Kraq's system, it's the GFX world's system in general.
Oh, the only GFX forum I go is GFXResource. There, the only comments they give you is "AWESOME,REALLY NICE EFFECTS" if you have Topaz in you're tag. It's quite disgusting, everyone Topaz the shit out of their tags.
/rant over
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:15 am
by 0l3n
FringeFX is a pretty good GFX forum, try posting your work there as well.
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:26 pm
by Scarth
0l3n wrote:FringeFX is a pretty good GFX forum, try posting your work there as well.
Oh god, that tag. It's back? FU team dice. D:
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:38 pm
by 0l3n
Scarth wrote:0l3n wrote:FringeFX is a pretty good GFX forum, try posting your work there as well.
Oh god, that tag. It's back? FU team dice. D:

Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:04 pm
by Scarth
0l3n wrote:Scarth wrote:0l3n wrote:FringeFX is a pretty good GFX forum, try posting your work there as well.
Oh god, that tag. It's back? FU team dice. D:

I'd love to be able to walk on water... o_o
Re: [Ex] Aurora // CnC
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:57 pm
by 0l3n
Lol, even Snudge got a wind of this.
I do miss the old sod
