Page 1 of 1

Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:37 pm
by DumboDii
Image

V2
Image

Bring it on!

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:54 pm
by Noobs_Slayer
I like it!
It does look nice. 9.9/10 for me ;)
Nice colorz!

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 2:48 am
by Tig3ress
10/10

<3

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:24 am
by crazyskwrls
wow this is awesome 10/10

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:25 am
by Kirkaldi
I don't like it. =/ Your old sig was a lot better.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:49 am
by Miguez
It has a nice style and colours but the render makes it 8/10.

Something weird about it

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 4:13 am
by Kraq
I want to comment on the lighting, it's great.
But, your stuck on the 100 px lighting technique. Do some more realistic lighting stuff and it will look even better.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:17 am
by .Banshee
Is that Lady GaGa? Because it's most definitely not Katy Perry(surprisingly)

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:29 am
by Sae
Love the colors! and +1 to Kraq's comment.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:28 am
by DumboDii
Kraq wrote:I want to comment on the lighting, it's great.
But, your stuck on the 100 px lighting technique. Do some more realistic lighting stuff and it will look even better.


Ya you are right I should try to improve that. I'm just out of ideas.

.Banshee wrote:Is that Lady GaGa? Because it's most definitely not Katy Perry(surprisingly)


Just some random girl I found from internet.

And thanks all for comments.^^

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:08 pm
by DumboDii
New version added. I tried to fix the lightning.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:06 am
by .Banshee
V2 is better. The lighting is softer and looks more natural than V1. But why don't you use light c4ds for your lighting? I use them a lot and they are pretty easy to manipulate.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:56 am
by DumboDii
.Banshee wrote:V2 is better. The lighting is softer and looks more natural than V1. But why don't you use light c4ds for your lighting? I use them a lot and they are pretty easy to manipulate.


I never realised you could use them for making lightning. Could you send some good ones? I gotta try it.

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:19 pm
by .Banshee
Done

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:01 am
by Doron
isn't that the anorexia version of the Ghost Whisperer girl?

Re: Lol wut? It's been a while.

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:08 am
by DumboDii
Icealya wrote:isn't that the anorexia version of the Ghost Whisperer girl?


If you are refering to the girl in my sig, then no.