Free Forums for Silkroad Online players.
https://dev.silkroadforums.com/
its awesome...the only thing i dont like is how the top and bottom pop outVerfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
Verfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
Melez wrote:Verfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
+1
Work on depth, and composition overall.. I mean rainbow colors don't go very well with a chick who points a shotgun in your face, right?
Melez wrote:Verfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
+1
Work on depth, and composition overall.. I mean rainbow colors don't go very well with a chick who points a shotgun in your face, right?
lavapockets wrote:Melez wrote:Verfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
+1
Work on depth, and composition overall.. I mean rainbow colors don't go very well with a chick who points a shotgun in your face, right?
lulz I certainly beg to differ. Just because a gun is symbolic for male power doesn't mean when we feminize it, it can't come with some rainbow colors. Now...what doesn't work here is the overall composition. If you're going to use a cutout, which I'm not really a big fan of anyways, you should at least include the top of the chicks head. As it stands now, it's a cut off cut out
Melez wrote:lavapockets wrote:Melez wrote:Work on depth, and composition overall.. I mean rainbow colors don't go very well with a chick who points a shotgun in your face, right?
lulz I certainly beg to differ. Just because a gun is symbolic for male power doesn't mean when we feminize it, it can't come with some rainbow colors. Now...what doesn't work here is the overall composition. If you're going to use a cutout, which I'm not really a big fan of anyways, you should at least include the top of the chicks head. As it stands now, it's a cut off cut out
Wat about the chick in your sig?
lavapockets wrote:Melez wrote:lavapockets wrote:lulz I certainly beg to differ. Just because a gun is symbolic for male power doesn't mean when we feminize it, it can't come with some rainbow colors. Now...what doesn't work here is the overall composition. If you're going to use a cutout, which I'm not really a big fan of anyways, you should at least include the top of the chicks head. As it stands now, it's a cut off cut out
Wat about the chick in your sig?
Not sure if you're referring to the colors...there are a lot of them, and I like it that way. If you're referring to my comment about the pop up sigs, well neither of mine is pop out (bc I don't like them.) If you'll notice, on hers she attempted to simulate the pop out by erasing the border over her render. This emphasizes the fact that the head is cut off. If you're talking about my positioning, I happen to like the way I put them in there. I don't think your render has to always perfectly have their head in the center of the screen, it's very odd to me. I think partial body lends more to the overall feel than the top of a person's head anyway. Besides, I couldn't get the gun in the screen the way I wanted to if I left the head in. And I don't like the look of anything larger than 125.
DumboDii wrote:Lil off topick but when you say "Work with the depth" what does that mean in action ?
Sorry for noob question but i just wanna be sure
Melez wrote:DumboDii wrote:Lil off topick but when you say "Work with the depth" what does that mean in action ?
Sorry for noob question but i just wanna be sure
It means that you should make some depth.
It's like blurring the things that are like "far away", and sharpening the things that are "closer". So it looks more realistic, and way more cooler. Just don't overuse those tools.
Melez wrote:Verfo wrote:render over border look very weird O.O, good job though kiu.
+1
Work on depth, and composition overall.. I mean rainbow colors don't go very well with a chick who points a shotgun in your face, right?
Kraq wrote:Ever heard of PM's?
Melez wrote:Work on depth, and composition overall
Kirkaldi wrote:Hi Mew, I know its you.
Priam wrote:Melez wrote:Work on depth, and composition overall
Look at Melez's sig if you want to know how to do it right! beepbeep!
I know I'm not even near proish, and that was about a month ago, but I was just giving advice 
Priam wrote:Melez wrote:Work on depth, and composition overall
Look at Melez's sig if you want to know how to do it right! beepbeep!
Hostage wrote:Priam wrote:Melez wrote:Work on depth, and composition overall
Look at Melez's sig if you want to know how to do it right! beepbeep!
I lol'ed. xD
Priam if I asked you for you hand in marriage would you shut me down?