Digital art design, renderings, signatures and anything art related. Upload pictures of your newest work or ask for feedback. Post graphics requests or discuss art in general.
maxietheboss wrote:http://www.flickr.com/photos/37274482@N06/ my flickr stream. things u put on the are just for fun/experiments. I can't really control copyright etc of my photo's there so that's why i don't really like it
Click the little green square to change the copyright info.
lol work makes you free thats cool
I started using my Dad's old Canon AE-1 (film) camera to take pics of sports events at school but one roll didn't turn out so that was the end of that. I got the D60 and have been enjoying it ever since. I wish it had live view but you cant win them all I guess. I would love to get a D700. Such a BA camera.
i am glad that i can use my dad's old D200, he recently bought the D700 that thing is really awesome about the copyright, people can still download the image so they can use it on their sites. Now for the images on my stream i don't care if they are downloaded and put on a site, but for my sports photography we use a more secure system, called Gallery2
Ohh I see. I didnt know thats what you wanted. You could watermark your pics but thats kind of a pain.
Just got back from taking pics of some Baseball and Tennis.
I was just looking at the D3 and D3x. I noticed something that seems to me to be a pretty important aspect of a camera. Continuous shooting on the D3 can reach up to 11 fps in the DX format and only 7 frames with the D3x in the same format. Doesn't that seem odd that a newer (and extremely higher priced) camera would be that way?
Some of my pics. These are old mostly, my newer stuff is still sitting in my laptop which I gave to my mom -.- These were all taken while my light meter was broken too, so the exposure on some of them really bites.
Deadsolid wrote:Ohh I see. I didnt know thats what you wanted. You could watermark your pics but thats kind of a pain.
Just got back from taking pics of some Baseball and Tennis.
I was just looking at the D3 and D3x. I noticed something that seems to me to be a pretty important aspect of a camera. Continuous shooting on the D3 can reach up to 11 fps in the DX format and only 7 frames with the D3x in the same format. Doesn't that seem odd that a newer (and extremely higher priced) camera would be that way?
that's why people think the D3X is overpriced, it probably has a lower continuous shooting speed because the MP count is higher > larger files > more strain on the buffer > lower continuous speed
maxietheboss wrote:that's why people think the D3X is overpriced, it probably has a lower continuous shooting speed because the MP count is higher > larger files > more strain on the buffer > lower continuous speed
I totally wish I could share some of the pics I took of our recent track event. Since this is my first warm-weather season of taking pictures and I am pretty much just wingin it, so when I get a nice pic I get all pumped. The depth of field I got in some of my pics is just amazing. It does help if you have a lot of light as well. I tried taking pics at a basketball game or two during the tournament but they all turned up like crap, high ISO noise and lots-o motion blur. Sad really, coulda had some nice shots.
