Digital art design, renderings, signatures and anything art related. Upload pictures of your newest work or ask for feedback. Post graphics requests or discuss art in general.
well she says "don't do that" she is referring to that rippling efect thing you have around your render not the bluring part. I agree I think it looks a bit weird but the back ground is cool.
well she says "don't do that" she is referring to that rippling efect thing you have around your render not the bluring part. I agree I think it looks a bit weird but the back ground is cool.
V2 looks much better. the onle thing I'll say is youre lacking a light source. Just take a bright colored brush and make a spot or two where you think it will look good (and where you think the light is coming from). That'll really bring the sig to life. And when you do that, you can darken the parts away from the light to create some sort of depth.
I don't mean to be offensive but every sig I see from you is similar. And the key to improving in this stuff is to always try different things. When you read tutorials you can always learn some new tricks and you should apply that to what you do.
V2 is WAAAAAY better. See, I see effects(Well, it looks like a C4d to her right though). What you gotta learn, is how to make your effects stand out more. Dont make them the same colour scheme as your background. Don't be afraid to put clashing colours together. Lateron as you progress more towards the end of the sig, the colours will(probably) even out a bit, so they still form a nice colourscheme.
Snudge wrote:V2 is WAAAAAY better. See, I see effects(Well, it looks like a C4d to her right though). What you gotta learn, is how to make your effects stand out more. Dont make them the same colour scheme as your background. Don't be afraid to put clashing colours together. Lateron as you progress more towards the end of the sig, the colours will(probably) even out a bit, so they still form a nice colourscheme.