My 2nd sig :D

Roweena · Post by **Roweena** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:40 pm

well... it's not much.. but there it is

What do you think? Any suggestions?

Cinema · Post by **Cinema** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:44 pm

Well from the looks of it.. Its a render with lowered opacity.... A stock.. Text with lowered opacity..

:\ Not that much but better then some of the 2nd sigs I've seen laying around other forums :wink:

Roweena · Post by **Roweena** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:46 pm

ok tnx for describing it

got any suggestions?

*EDIT* i don't wanna make it to complicated... i like it simple... all i want to know is if it looks good.

Cinema · Post by **Cinema** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:49 pm

Roweena wrote:ok tnx for describing it

got any suggestions?

..Ya.. I normally do describe sigs

.. I have to stop that habit..

Well lowering the opacity on basically anything ruins the sig most times..

And having that render in there just ruins it for me personally..

Roweena · Post by **Roweena** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:52 pm

so you want me to remove the render? that would mean that the sig will have only the stock and the text... i want it simple... but not that simple

Roweena · Post by **Roweena** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:50 am

any suggestions?

Dugu · Post by **Dugu** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:23 pm

..Ya.. I normally do describe sigs Sad.. I have to stop that habit..

Well lowering the opacity on basically anything ruins the sig most times..

And having that render in there just ruins it for me personally..

I disagree with that. Although you never want to use opacity on your centerpeice, using opacity can give more variation in the background. Lensflare without any opacity rarely works, however lens flare with a bit or high opacity can reresent glow, reflection, or stars much better. Transparency also works well with lighting, color/lnear dodging and burning, and contrast as well as many other things, even brushing.

I strongly disagree with hybrids.

Just for that, I'm not going to add anythng new.

rek · Post by **rek** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:27 pm

Dugu wrote:
..Ya.. I normally do describe sigs Sad.. I have to stop that habit..

Well lowering the opacity on basically anything ruins the sig most times..

And having that render in there just ruins it for me personally..

I disagree with that. Although you never want to use opacity on your centerpeice, using opacity can give more variation in the background. Lensflare without any opacity rarely works, however lens flare with a bit or high opacity can reresent glow, reflection, or stars much better. Transparency also works well with lighting, color/lnear dodging and burning, and contrast as well as many other things, even brushing.

I strongly disagree with hybrids.

Just for that, I'm not going to add anythng new.

+1 if something is too strong(lighting etc) lower the opacity

Rizla · Post by **Rizla** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:53 am

way too big

you know you can just look at one of your old posts right?

Xanovaria · Post by **Xanovaria** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:03 am

Wasn't asking for commentary ergo the "disregard this post"

Rizla · Post by **Rizla** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:07 am

Xanovaria wrote:Wasn't asking for commentary ergo the "disregard this post"

main reason I posted was to tell you your post wasn't necessary in the first place, unless it was your first post on SRF, which it isn't. Commentary was free