New sig, stock in sigmaking.

Geedunk · Post by **Geedunk** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:44 pm

Meh, not my best, not my worst..

Constructive critism appreciated!

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:12 pm

Img dont show... :banghead:

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:24 pm

ya i cant see it

Geedunk · Post by **Geedunk** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Sorry - Should work perfectly now.

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:44 pm

i cant see the text very well on the seonc image the first is better

Geedunk · Post by **Geedunk** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:46 pm

Master_wong wrote:i cant see the text very well on the seonc image the first is better

Must be your screen or gfx. I see it perfectly :S

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:00 pm

i think the second one is better

Geedunk · Post by **Geedunk** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:17 pm

And then for the constructive part -.-

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:24 pm

well this screen is bad il have a look when im at home but stil you need it to be more standing out then i can make out

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:26 pm

And then for the constructive part -.-

well the girl is to opacitated and the text is kind of plain.

Geedunk · Post by **Geedunk** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:35 pm

0l3n wrote:
And then for the constructive part -.-

well the girl is to opacitated and the text is kind of plain.

Not constructive

.

- I know she is, and I'm gonna fix it when I've got time.

About the text - I suck at making text.

naljamees51 · Post by **naljamees51** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:41 pm

its nice sig ^.~
but u think you shold make a bigger border

this one what u hawe right now is..well i dont think its that nice ^^
[the border]
but the sig is nice