Digital art design, renderings, signatures and anything art related. Upload pictures of your newest work or ask for feedback. Post graphics requests or discuss art in general.
Then he'll be voting for the one he actually likes, right -.-?
ot: Ex's suffers from empty space + corner ball looks awkward. MK gets my vote gets my vote (though the stock pic is low quality). Jaksje... And I'd kill anyone who uses kraq's thing as a sig, that thing is dangerous D:
Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people." - Day[9] Daily 337 -
IMO, jaks stuck to the theme more than the rest. Ex does have a "Life"-ish theme to it but it's a bit too generic and one could easily find other words that could fit into that sig. So...jaks gmv.
inky wrote:IMO, jaks stuck to the theme more than the rest. Ex does have a "Life"-ish theme to it but it's a bit too generic and one could easily find other words that could fit into that sig. So...jaks gmv.
This makes me chuckle a bit, seeing as the first 3, conceptually, are dead similar.
Last edited by Kraq on Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
inky wrote:IMO, jaks stuck to the theme more than the rest. Ex does have a "Life"-ish theme to it but it's a bit too generic and one could easily find other words that could fit into that sig. So...jaks gmv.
This makes me chuckle a bit, seeing as the first 3, conceptually, are dead similar.
Mine, well, not much too say. I wanted it to be unconventional; life is a mindfuck. I don't wish to elaborate on it seeing as I will most likely sound like a pompous transcendentalist. I also didn't spend much time on it either, so there you go.
I agree with you completely. The only reason I didn't vote for yours is cause it's SIG of the Forthnight, And the piece you made is painful to look at for a long time. It's just not suited for a signature, but I don't mind the idea itself.
I generally dislike about 90% of the sigs with women in them (no homo) -___-
Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people." - Day[9] Daily 337 -
inky wrote:IMO, jaks stuck to the theme more than the rest. Ex does have a "Life"-ish theme to it but it's a bit too generic and one could easily find other words that could fit into that sig. So...jaks gmv.
This makes me chuckle a bit, seeing as the first 3, conceptually, are dead similar.
Mine, well, not much too say. I wanted it to be unconventional; life is a mindfuck. I don't wish to elaborate on it seeing as I will most likely sound like a pompous transcendentalist. I also didn't spend much time on it either, so there you go.
I agree with you completely. The only reason I didn't vote for yours is cause it's SIG of the Forthnight, And the piece you made is painful to look at for a long time. It's just not suited for a signature, but I don't mind the idea itself.
I generally dislike about 90% of the sigs with women in them (no homo) -___-
This whole argument is kind of pointless. I mean, there's no real "picture" to represent "Life". Shomari chose a vague theme so we could interpret what we feel is appropriate to the theme.
P.S: Kraq, I really like your concept but feel it's a bit too simple. Of course, simple can be a good thing.
my bad. forgot to count kraq since i only looked at it once before it started burning through my eyeballs. unconventional? yes. as far as sticking to the theme goes though...well, you have your explanation for it. =p
i mean no disrespect btw. i generalized but i was referring to the "girl + word" tags.
Its the artists perception of the subject, and thats that. It could be the girl, it could be the expression/gestures they're making, it could be the colors to signify a mood, or it could be that life is a mindfuck as kraq said.
lol ok. don't make such a big fuss out of it. my point is that girls + words tags are way too overused that they all seem too generic most of the time. this is from my perspective as part of the audience. of course their work reflects their interpretation of the theme, however, that doesn't mean it will always be perceived the same way by the people who look at it. i'm not trying to be an ass to anyone - nor am i telling people that they should change anything - i'm simply explaining my rationale. perhaps it's simply because i don't see the same vision that they do or that i've been seeing way too many girl+word tags. if you disagree, fine - that's your opinion, that's your vote.
i do respect that it's your work and your interpretation but i'm not going to take back what i said because that's my right to express my thoughts. good day.