Gamer

[aazumak]

for SOTW



yea, still trying new stuff out


edit:


as for the grass being slanted, i tipped the whole sig, and extended the sky by hand, the render didnt fit my sig size

[HOLLAstir]

Looks LQ. Overall it needs more depth. Balance out the tones better. The kid on the grass looks weird to me. The grass cuts off and slops, yet the kid stays the same. Just doesn't look right. I like that you're trying out different styles, as i'm doing the same.

[HavinFunSince89]

For me I say that the effect of the laptop doesn't look good cuz it look like it's busted.

[rek]

Not really liking this one, because the effekts around him look fsfsdf..


The outline of the boy looks like you cut him out with a soft brush.

[BrokenSaint]

At least he's stepping out of his usual style and I'm liking it. Try experimenting more with this. Anywho, the colors are awesome. Nice text placement too. I'd pick a different stock though lol

[Waisha]

The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

[Hostage]

The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

Thank you.

It seems like people are just looking for something to bitch about the sig. I get it " ...in a GFX forum they're more harsh...they're this...they're that" blah blah fikkity blah. You know what though I remember when people used to get referred to SRF AC because we're not like other GFX sites. We tell you what you need to know to improve without all the bitchy-ness ( yes that's a word =P).

Now I'm not saying be all lovey touchy feely just don't bash the sig like it's shit right off the bat.

Anyway, I don't see a problem with the quality of the pic. Just seem's a bit empty to me and I do agree with HOLLA on the slope. It seems a bit odd.

[HOLLAstir]

It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

[Waisha]

It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ?

[HOLLAstir]

It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ?

Well they either choose LQ stocks, or the effects they do to it, makes it appear LQ. Forgot to add the last part.

[deep.in]

What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it mad, i'm mad


Nice sig btw

[deep.in]

What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it mad, i'm mad


Nice sig btw

The new theme for the new week is Video Games.

But,but but but where is topic? i cant find it And thx

[Hostage]

It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.

[deep.in]

Oh my i tought Sig Wars is 1vs1 Sorry

[aazumak]

yes, my stock is average size, kinda small, but not horrible quality, but my sharpen effect on lighten made it look LQ

i realize it now, but it seemed good at first

[Waisha]

I also think the LQ look could be beacause of the blue effect interfering with the edges of the stock. I like the sig alot though. Awesome flow.

[HOLLAstir]

It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.

I only say "harsh" because thats how people here take it.

[YangKang]

lol, imo it looks like you made his smile go from to "WTF WHY ISNT THIS WORKING!????"