Search found 7 matches

by HaTe
Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:11 pm
Forum: Silkroad General Discussion
Topic: Who won on your server?
Replies: 67
Views: 2496

Re: Who won on your server?

lol no one appliedon venus XD I'm curious about Pacific In Babel we had 16 guilds attack us. They hit the gates a couple times. Quit with about 30 mins left. Sounds like some serious A55 WH00PING huh.... FW on babel is sad rite now . Used to be more fun but every week gets easier and easier but ill...
by HaTe
Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:37 pm
Forum: Silkroad General Discussion
Topic: Knightress' Post
Replies: 68
Views: 3555

Re: Knightress' Post

I cant keep replying to all topics to many topics and drama ever since this bannin botters from forum idea came up so ill just reply to the 1 on top atm. I like how people compare this game to real life. You say rules are rules sure there are rules people break them in game and in LIFE. Ur telling m...
by HaTe
Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:54 am
Forum: Silkroad General Discussion
Topic: Winning the war on bots!!!
Replies: 40
Views: 1596

Re: Winning the war on bots!!!

Maybe this might be a easier solution for the admins.

Since there will be legits left in this forum , ban every account thats not an admin , than any1 that is legit and still want to use this forum will surely make a new account. Wouldnt that just save time ?
by HaTe
Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:52 pm
Forum: Silkroad General Discussion
Topic: Winning the war on bots!!!
Replies: 40
Views: 1596

Re: Winning the war on bots!!!

+1 to bunny he knows what he talking about.
by HaTe
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Forum: Silkroad General Discussion
Topic: i hate saying this but ........
Replies: 37
Views: 1529

Re: i hate saying this but ........

all this people banning may hurt the site and i seing some old srf members get ban and besides from playing the game wish i know i dont anymore we are friends sorta so loyalty any1 ? this would be kick ass to do in game but on forum is different >.< (repost) I would agree with u. This forums have 1...
by HaTe
Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:29 pm
Forum: Exposed Botters
Topic: Crumpets [Insufficient proof]
Replies: 104
Views: 7953

Re: Crumpets

aruin wrote:
hootsh wrote:
wacko_jacko wrote:LOL
Should i go for +3 on my staff?
anyone please help?


ROFLOL AHAHAHHAHAHAHA

AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAHAHAH

OMG, masterpiece...this is pure gold.

hhaaha

I dont see how this is funny but eh thats just me :banghead:
by HaTe
Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:18 pm
Forum: Exposed Botters
Topic: Crumpets [Insufficient proof]
Replies: 104
Views: 7953

Re: Crumpets

OL_Spongey wrote:Someone write a book dammit!..

Great idea . What should the title be ?

Go to advanced search